Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PugetSoundSoldier
You asked me to "explain" McCain's ACU rating. I have. You speak of “results and actions”. I provided them. If that site was too convoluted for your mind I'll post the pertinent parts:

First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006.

As might be expected, ACU ratings essentially reflect party affiliation. At the halfway point, ranking 50th, we have Richard Shelby (R-AL, formerly D-AL) with a lifetime score of 74.2. But Robert Byrd (D-WV) ranks just slightly lower at 58th, with a score of only 29.6. By the time you get to 66th place, all scores are below 20.

What this means is that McCain's ACU ratings since 1998 put him on the liberal side among Republicans. The few Republicans consistently more liberal than McCain would be Chafee (formerly R-RI), Collins (R-ME), Snowe (R-ME) and Specter (R-PA). One could expect senators from northeastern states to be more liberal since their constituencies demand it, but McCain represents the fairly conservative state of Arizona. (Arizona's other senator, Kyl, has a lifetime rating of 96.9, and half the representatives from there have ratings of 94.7 or higher.)

How much more liberal would McCain vote if his constituency put even the slightest pressure on him in that direction?

He's a sellout, supported by those whose fear of Hillary or Obama cause them to cower in a corner. You people aren't defending this country, you're weakening it. You do so by diluting the conservative movement with liberal wanna-bes. I pity you.

99 posted on 05/10/2008 6:27:03 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: South40

Ummm...

The 2007 ratings have been out for a while.


100 posted on 05/10/2008 6:29:02 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: South40
“He's a sellout, supported by those whose fear of Hillary or Obama cause them to cower in a corner. You people aren't defending this country, you're weakening it. You do so by diluting the conservative movement with liberal wanna-bes. I pity you”.

The cower in a corner because of fear types, must at this minute, cease to call themselves conservatives. I pity all of us.

107 posted on 05/10/2008 6:33:53 PM PDT by alarm rider ("Difficile est saturam non scibere" -- it's difficult not to write satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson