Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Senators Offer Bill to Increase US Supplies (S.2958)
oil & gas journal ^ | May 2, 2008 | Nick Snow

Posted on 05/10/2008 2:05:03 PM PDT by kellynla

WASHINGTON, DC, May 2 -- US Senate Republicans responded May 1 to near record-high oil prices with a bill to authorize leasing within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and increase access to the Outer Continental Shelf.

S. 2958, the American Energy Production Act, would produce as much as 24 billion bbl of oil from ANWR and the OCS, enough to supply domestic needs for 5 years, according to bill sponsor Pete V. Domenici (R-NM), who also is ranking minority member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee. Seventeen other Senate Republicans are cosponsors.

"For years now, I have been trying to develop more domestic production of oil and gas, and for years, with one exception in the Gulf of Mexico, I have been blocked for political reasons. Consumers are now paying the price for those years of obstruction," Domenici said.

The bill would allow governors of states on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to petition for leasing and have federal moratoriums and withdrawals lifted. New federal leases would operate under a revenue-sharing agreement in which states would receive 37.5%, the federal treasury 50%, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund 12.5%.

It also would repeal the $4,000 fee for onshore drilling permit applications, a 2% reduction of states' shares of federal mineral royalties and a 1-year moratorium on funding formulation of regulations for commercial oil shale leasing. The three provisions were inserted into the Omnibus Appropriations Bill late last year.

Refinery permit provision It also would grant the US Environmental Protection Agency authority to accept consolidated applications for permits required to construct new refineries. Financial assistance to states and Indian tribes for hiring employees to process permit applications also would be authorized. Application decision deadlines of 360 days for constructing new refineries and 120 days for expanding existing plants would be established.

S. 2958 also would suspend crude oil purchases for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for 180 days. It also would repeal Section 526 of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act which bars federal agencies from contracting for alternative fuels with longer greenhouse gas lifecycle emissions than the conventional fuels they would replace. The provision's author, House Oversight and Investigations Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), has said that it would apply to any contract for a coal-to-liquids or other alternative fuel or for "a fuel produced from a non-conventional petroleum source such as tar sands."

The bill also would authorize research to study transportation needs for renewable fuel blends, mandate that 6 billion gal of coal-derived fuels be produced by 2022, launch a study of diesel-fueled vehicles' environmental and energy attributes, and extend US Department of Defense contract limits for synthetic fuels to 25 years from 5 years.

'Produce more at home' "Congress has spent billions to research and develop clean sources of energy," Domenici said, adding, "I've been a leader in those efforts and I will continue to be. However, we must face the fact that no matter what we do, America will still need oil, and without action, an increasingly large portion of that oil will come from unstable regions. With gas prices soaring higher and higher, we must produce more at home and this bill allows us to do that in an environmentally responsible manner."

Sen. John Barraso (R-Wyo.), one of the measure's cosponsors, said, "Record oil prices are a burden whether it is for transportation, home heating, or groceries. The issues of high prices and foreign dependence go hand-in-hand. This bill hits the nail on the head when it comes to addressing America's energy needs."

Another cosponsor, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alas.), said the US has the resources to produce more oil and gas. "We just need the policies that will allow us to develop those resources. We have the technology to not only safeguard the environment while developing resources, but also safeguard Americans' bank accounts at a time when they are struggling to meet rising energy costs," she said.

But the bill faces an uncertain future in the Senate and House since Democrats hold a majority in both and many have said they believe development of alternative fuels and renewable technologies would be more beneficial environmentally and economically.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; energy; gasoline; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: EagleandLiberty

The tourism industry thinks oil rigs are icky-poo, apparently.


21 posted on 05/13/2008 7:06:12 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ...

PING!


22 posted on 05/13/2008 7:41:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

"Not developing your own natural resources is illogical."

23 posted on 05/13/2008 7:45:43 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
PONG!

free dixie,sw

24 posted on 05/13/2008 8:30:23 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to TYRANTS is OBEDIENCE to God. T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Hasn’t McCain already said that because of Global Warming, we need to burn LESS oil? It’ll be interesting to see if he takes time off the campaign pander trail to even vote on this one.


25 posted on 05/13/2008 8:42:09 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

If McCain has a brain in his head, he’ll vote for it!
Of course he’s against drilling in ANWR which is moronic!


26 posted on 05/13/2008 8:51:21 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Maybe not. His recent Global Warming speeches would suggest he'd vote against it. Knowing how much he's been pandering to the Left these days, I could see him just skipping the vote as a way of setting up plausible deniability.

The guys a blatant opportunist with very little in the way of morals or principles. I'd put nothing past him.

27 posted on 05/13/2008 8:53:00 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The guys a blatant opportunist with very little in the way of morals or principles. I'd put nothing past him.

McCain also seems to be consumed with proving he's not really a conservative.

28 posted on 05/13/2008 9:08:02 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson