Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

“On national defense,”

Both candidates are open borders amnesty types. You can’t have national defense if you REFUSE to secure your borders.

“on taxes”

McBackstabber voted against the Bush tax cuts USING LEFTY LINGO, “tax cuts for the wealthy.” No, I don’t care what lie he is telling you now.

“on judges.”

With a Dim Senate? Juan will give you only judges that Ted Kennedy approves of.

See? No difference.


260 posted on 05/10/2008 5:11:50 PM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor
Both candidates are open borders amnesty types. You can’t have national defense if you REFUSE to secure your borders.

Really? Because McCain voted FOR the border fence, and has consistently supported border enforcement. Can you point to ONE bill or vote where he did not?

McBackstabber voted against the Bush tax cuts USING LEFTY LINGO, “tax cuts for the wealthy.” No, I don’t care what lie he is telling you now.

Yep, but there is no denying he's also opposed to increased government spending. He may not always want to cut taxes, but he steadfastly refuses to increase them NOR increase spending.

With a Dim Senate? Juan will give you only judges that Ted Kennedy approves of.

Do you think with a Democrat Senate that any nominee from Duncan Hunter, or Tom Tancredo, or Tom Delay, or even President Reagan wouldn't have to be approved by Ted Kennedy and the other Democrats?

See, if the Democrats control the Senate, BY DEFINITION any judicial appointments would have to be approved by the Democrats - meaning Ted Kennedy.

Now, do you think you'll get more Ginsburg and Breyer appointments with Obama or Hillary! or with McCain, who voted for Alito and Roberts?

264 posted on 05/10/2008 5:39:10 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

To: Grunthor

I think the moral of the story here is that you simply don’t get it. Don’t feel too bad, though - you’re far from the only one. There are a whole lot of so-called “conservative” dimwits here who share your hope of installing Hillary or Obama in the White House.

Some of us here will fight to the very end. I’ve gathered the owner does not care for McCain; not many of us do. However, when the primary season started Free Republic was in full-on attack mode against Giuliani and Romney. The official support was for Fred Thompson, a guy who I loved but by all measures wasn’t even interested in running. Duncan Hunter never had a prayer. Since FR had its Giuliani and Romney “Truth Files,” we ended up with McCain. Well, that’s f*cking great. You made your bed, and now you sleep in it.

I for one will never accept your premise. I speak of the notion that America is screwed no matter who gets elected. I hope you don’t have children, because it seems like you would just encourage them to give up at the first sign of difficulty. If your son or daughter turns out to not be that intelligent, what would you do? Would you tell him to be a tradesman and do the best that he can?

America is not screwed. I should add that even if I believed we were, I would fight to the bitter end by electing the best candidate available. I will do everything I can to choose the candidate best suited to continue the success of the United States - even if that candidate is far from ideal. I will not have any part in handing over the country to a Marxist. It doesn’t even matter if McCain were a Democrat - he’s the best candidate left.

You defeatists make me physically ill.


276 posted on 05/10/2008 9:01:40 PM PDT by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson