Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

These activist judges need to be removed from office, either by recall (if applicable) or impeachment.


4 posted on 05/09/2008 7:18:23 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Karl Marx supported free trade. Does that make him a free market conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

Contempt of courts is my mantra. These men who work in dresses are responsible for all this crap.


11 posted on 05/09/2008 7:56:47 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
These activist judges need to be removed from office, either by recall (if applicable) or impeachment.

That's an old refrain. We know by now that the spineless scumbag politicians simply don't have the guts.

18 posted on 05/09/2008 11:30:40 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

>>>These activist judges need to be removed from office, either by recall (if applicable) or impeachment.

This was the only decision the judges could have reached under the backdrop of current law.

I discussed this last year on a thread regarding the Florida anti-gay marriage campaign

“”Ultimately a waste of time I think. Eventually the matter will be before the Supreme Court where the United States Constitution’s “Full Faith and Credit Clause” will trump the local restrictions.

Florida can choose to set its own restrictions on marriages performed in that jurisdiction, but legal marriages from elsewhere are legally binding on Florida and any other state. To illustrate, consider how different states set varying age requirements for marriage, but the marriage isn’t void when moving to a state that sets a higher age. And interstate travel to marry in a more accommodating state is already common.

You also had the same situation in the old days when divorce was much more limited. People got around this by going to Nevada for a quickie divorce the original restrictive state was forced to recognize.

Absent a federal constitutional amendment, which apparently isn’t going to happen, I really see no other final outcome.””

3 posted on Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:36:21 AM by tlb


19 posted on 05/10/2008 4:44:18 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
New York's constitution needs to be revised in some manner to prohibit rule by one-man dictat.

Possibly they could put a clause in there that would make a judge, governor or other public official who attempted to rule this way an "outlaw" subject to punishment by any citizen at any time.

27 posted on 05/10/2008 9:38:37 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson