Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLOOMBERG OUTRAGE: ASKS JUDGE TO BAN 2ND AMENDMENT REFERENCES!
SAF ^ | May 9, 2008 | Staff

Posted on 05/09/2008 6:05:00 PM PDT by yoe

BELLEVUE, WA – New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has moved from outrage to atrocity by asking anti-gun activist federal Judge Jack B. Weinstein to ban any reference to the Second Amendment during a civil lawsuit trial beginning May 27 against Georgia gun dealer Jay Wallace, proprietor at Adventure Outdoors.

The New York Sun reported that Bloomberg’s attorneys made the request. Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, said the move clearly shows that Bloomberg has “total disregard not only for the Second Amendment, but also the First.”

Bloomberg’s attorney on this case, Eric Proshansky, has reportedly argued in a brief that “Any references to the Second Amendment or analogous state constitutional provisions are likewise irrelevant” to the upcoming trial.

“This trial is supposed to be held in a federal court, not a kangaroo court,” Gottlieb stated. “What’s next, a request that Judge Weinstein not allow defense witnesses or rebuttal? Why not just dispense with the trial altogether and lynch Mr. Wallace from the limb of a tree out in Central Park?

“The civil prosecution, and un-civil persecution, of Jay Wallace has never really been about the Second Amendment, until right now,” he observed. “And, thanks to Mr. Proshansky’s brief, this trial is suddenly all about the First Amendment as well.

“We are neither surprised nor shocked at Mayor Bloomberg and the city’s attorney for making this move,” Gottlieb added. “This is the kind of behavior one should expect from a billionaire demagogue who considers himself so far above the law that he launched this vigilante campaign against firearms retailers by stepping outside legal channels in the first place. He sent private agents to several states without legal authority, jeopardizing legitimate on-going criminal investigations in the process.

“Now Bloomberg wants a gag order,” he concluded. “Apparently, in Mikey’s world, a fair trial is one in which a defense attorney is muzzled, and the defendant is already guilty until proven innocent. Bloomberg missed his calling. Instead of being mayor of an American city, he should have been the administrator of a gulag.”

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nations oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers and an amicus brief and fund for the Emerson case holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antigun; banglist; bloomberg; ny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: supercat
I wonder what Zenger et al. would have thought about that notion in the 1700's?

I knew I left a big opening in that statement. Personally, I believe in jury nullification in rare circumstances as I am a supporter of checks and balance. Good judges interpret the law correctly and avoid the need for it.

Irony though, is that while I have the right to a trial by jury, in a lot of cases I'd rather have a bench trial if I was a defendant. That's not always the case, but it is something I'd really consider.

61 posted on 05/10/2008 10:49:57 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: gogov

Second Amendment Foundation always does that with their headlines.


62 posted on 05/10/2008 10:50:40 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I think I see Bloomberg’s point. The only thing standing in the way of wealthy, powerful politicians proclaiming themselves King is an electorate legally armed by the Constitution.


63 posted on 05/10/2008 11:20:53 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogov

It wasn’t me, sport.

Check who posted the article.

You are new to Free Republic, aren’t you.


64 posted on 05/11/2008 6:57:22 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Yep, knew to FR. Only been posting here about 9 years. If the post fits, wear it. Otherwise figure someone replied to the wrong thread. I should have figured given your earlier post.

Now where is that poster I was after?

65 posted on 05/11/2008 7:56:18 AM PDT by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
Personally, I believe in jury nullification in rare circumstances as I am a supporter of checks and balance. Good judges interpret the law correctly and avoid the need for it.

Good judges interpret the law (and Law) correctly, but are all judges good?

Irony though, is that while I have the right to a trial by jury, in a lot of cases I'd rather have a bench trial if I was a defendant.

There should be some cases where you should want a jury trial, and some where you should want a bench trial. It all depends on the nature of the charge and your defense.

66 posted on 05/11/2008 10:29:43 AM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: gogov

Poster yoe:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~yoe/


67 posted on 05/11/2008 5:35:28 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: yoe

What part of the gun control laws in Hitler’s Germany don’t American Jews — like Bloombergg — NOT understand?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg9q9sxJFnA


68 posted on 05/12/2008 9:40:56 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson