Only Abstinence Education Offers 100 Percent Guarantee for Safe Sex

Life News ^ | 5/9/08 | Kevin Roeten

[wagglebee]

LifeNews.com Note: Roeten is a very conservative Catholic who likes the facts over readily displayed emotions. He is an editorial columnist who has frequently been published in numerous Internet and newspaper forums.

It’s been discovered. Nobody thought having “safe sex” was possible in every case. Each year 2.6 million teenagers become sexually active—a rate of 7000/day. With high school, nearly half report having engaged in sexual activity and 1/3 are currently active (Kim/Rector//Heritage Foundation).

As it turns out, teen sexual activity is extremely costly for teens and for society as a whole. From 1985-1990 alone, the federal government spent $120 billion on teenage childbearing. Teens who engage in sexual activity risk all kinds of costly and detrimental outcomes not limited to STD infections, emotional and psychological harm, lower educational attainment, and unmarried childbearing. All of these have direct impact on Medicare, Medicaid, government spending----and the budget.

It is known that STDs (Sexually Transmitted Diseases) infect -- about 12 million Americans per year, with 65,000 plagued with an incurable form (CDC). STDs are a direct cause of infertility in both men and women .

Nearly half of all pregnancies as well as 1 million teen pregnancies (95%) are unintended (CDC), and there are approximately 40,000 new HIV infections per year. An estimated 1.3 million babies die every year through abortion, and 84% of all US abortions are performed on unmarried women (US Dept of Commerce; GPO/1998). Teens who have babies out of wedlock are more likely to end up at the bottom of the socio-economic ladder. All of these numbers have huge economic implications for the country.

But society has found something that works 100% of the time. They found something on which you can completely depend---much better than condoms which may work part of the time. And that’s if you use them right.

The answer is easy, even though many don’t want to hear it--- “abstinence until marriage”. It breaks the unwritten rule of sex on demand. It clearly illuminates the slavery to our desires so many of us face. And it emblazons the oft repeated saying, “Why buy the cow, if the milk is free?”

Self-control is like an immune system. People who abhor sexual-control think they are breaking free, but in reality are breaking down. Control yourself and you will not be repressed—you will be free.

Our children are not animals incapable of controlling themselves and “will do it anyway”. Yet “comprehensive” sex-ed teaches them that they're just that.

But recently, a new study by the research firm Mathematica found that in the five programs that they studied, abstinence-instructed kids showed no statistical change in sexual behavior.

But what was actually learned was this study looked at only five programs out of more than 900 in place. It was also determined this program targeted children 9 to 11 who were not evaluated until four years later. Abstinence Education: Assessing the Evidence (Kim/ Rector) found 16 of the 21 studies completed so far reported positive results, while 5 studies did not report any significant positive results.

Zogby (5/8/07) found that 83% of parents think it is important for their child to wait until marriage to have sex. The Journal of Adolescent and Family Health concluded that a 66% decrease in teen pregnancy was due to teens choosing abstinence. The CDC showed a 53% decrease. But abstinence programs federally funded over the last 11 years still have many critics.

But several dozen Congressional abortion advocates have signed a letter to the House Appropriations Committee asking to cut all funds for abstinence education (Ertelt/LifeNews). According to the CDC, there has been a 13% decrease in the % of teens who have ever had sex between 1991 and 2005. Some 17 states have rejected this funding.

It’s interesting to note that our government has spent $12 on the comprehensive sex-ed/Planned Parenthood approach for every $1 spent on true abstinence projects. PP would love to zero-fund its competitors, especially since abstinent kids don’t spend any time in their clinics.

As parents, our offspring are worth everything. We want to keep them from developing STDs, AIDS, HIV, going through abortions, lower educational development, slavery, you name it. We have “abstinence until marriage” which guarantees freedom from the above. And we know simple abstinence education gives significantly better chances from those pitfalls.

Now what would make a parent shy away from 100% chance of surviving an experience with some of the worst occurrences that exist?

[wagglebee]

Now what would make a parent shy away from 100% chance of surviving an experience with some of the worst occurrences that exist?

And the left's answer is that the safety and well being of people IS NOT a factor in their agenda.

[wagglebee]

Education Ping

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[Dilbert San Diego]

well, people can always explore their outercourse alternatives.

[allmendream]

That abstinence graphic with the fingers almost touching has to be one of the most unintentionally funny things I have ever seen.

Abstinence “cuz only touching each-others fingers is allowed, and only tentatively!”.

And people wonder why Conservatism isn't a more attractive ideology to young people. Sheesh!

[DManA]

This isn’t a political issue.

[DManA]

Fact is, if everyone followed the Judeo/Christian advice on sex, all venerial diseases would be eliminated from Earth on one generation.

[goodnesswins]

more young people are coming to conservatism than ever...you dope.

[DaveyB]

[wagglebee]

Exactly!

[theFIRMbss]

>funny things I have ever seen

[wagglebee]

Your post bears a striking resemblance to ‘Rat/Planned Barrenhood talking points.

[DManA]

I confess I smiled. No lightning bolts yet.

[allmendream]

Seems the article in question ended by talking about the House Appropriations Committee. Apparently they thought it was political enough to get politicians involved.

[allmendream]

They think the Abstinence graphic is funny also?

[DManA]

I oppose bringing the government into it. Making it a political issue WILL turn off a lot of people. Best we can do is be advocates and role models.

[mngran2]

"Only Abstinence Education Offers 100 Percent Guarantee for Safe Sex"

Should read

"Only Abstinence Offers 100 Percent Guarantee for Safe Sex".

You can educate the kids about abstinence all day long, but some of them are still going to do it. That's just fact, and people who pretend it's not going to happen are silly.

[wagglebee]

Good point.

[SnakeDoctor]

>> Best we can do is be advocates and role models.

I actually agree entirely — and I fully understand that, by “role modeling”, you meant role modeling a moral Godly life.

I just think the idea of “role modeling” abstainance is mildly amusing. First of all, its a little like proving a negative ... just as I’m currently role-modeling abstainance (as my wife isn’t here for me to counter-role-model with), I’m also role modeling not participating in terrorist activity, not doing drugs, and not shooting people randomly.

Secondly, how, exactly, do you role model abstaining from something that, if you were to do it, you wouldn’t do it in front of anyone? The mind boggles.

Anyway — I’m married. I abjectly refuse to role model abstainance. :)

H

[allmendream]

And as long as young people see Conservatism as being an advocate of a strong National Defense, lower taxes, less government regulation, liberty, and a firm personal morality (as opposed to a government enforced morality) the trend will continue over to our side (although it hasn't tipped 50% as of yet).

When and if they perceive us to be a bunch of nanny State-ists with a big bugaboo about sex that same trend will decline.