Did you make them at the time the law was passed? Or did you suddenly realize that it was bad mojo when the libs started screaming about it in 2001?
I am surprised that many more conservatives have yet to object to them... unless it is not the Constitution for the United States you wish to conserve...
Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't agree with you on a civil rights issue is indeed an evil traitor to the republic. No hyperbole there. What specific provisions are unconstitutional?
I objected at the time of its passage, just as I did with the bill submitted by the Clowntoon after OKC. How convenient that they have this BS all written and ready to go, just waiting an incident of such magnitude as 9/11 and OKC to submit it for passage. At such times, even I have to question what foreknowledge the Feddies might have had... Then I smack myself for being a conspiracy theorist. Then something ELSE happens and I smack myself for smacking myself.
OBTW, I never used or even thought the phrase, evil traitor, so your strawman is still alive and kicking. What _I_ have to say is that you are not conserving the Constitution when you cheer for more and more legislation which puts more and more power in the hands of the Feddies THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED FOR THEM TO HAVE by the Founders. Which YOU very much do. Whether it be the worst aspects of the so called war on terror (USA PATRIOT, etc), the war on some drugs, legislation of (false) morality, whatever, if it puts more power over the lives of others into the hands of FedGov, I have seen where you are ALL OVER it... so your posturing can be saved for another audience.