From the PDF:
‘‘(ii) Any property constituting or derived
6 from any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly
7 as a result of a violation of subsection (a).
8 ‘‘(iii) Any property used, or intended to be
9 used, to commit or facilitate the commission of
10 a violation of subsection (a) that is owned or
11 predominantly controlled by the violator or by a
12 person conspiring with or aiding and abetting
13 the violator in committing the violation, except
14 that property is subject to forfeiture under this
15 clause only if the Government establishes that
16 there was a substantial connection between the
17 property and the violation of subsection (a).
That pretty much leaves it wide open there. It uses the same methods as the "Comprehensive Drug Abuse & Control Act of 1970" , so since they can take your house for drugs, I have to assume that means they plan on taking your house for copyright infringement also.
You could say they will just confiscate your computers, but theres nothing that makes them stop there.
the voting scorecard?
Right here.
Only 11 Noes, to include Ron Paul.