[Revereee]

I’m not an Attorney and I’m no fan of Joe Wilson’s - but in my opinion - when you look specifically at the fact that a C.I.A. Agent’s name was published against the Agent’s knowledge or will, I think that Agent has every reason to be bring a suit. Take the “politics” out of this issue, and I think the case has merit.

I also think this letter is a good one. (many of the signees were GW supporters).

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2005/07/intlet.pdf

[bmwcyle]

Your statement proves that you are not an Attorney.

[Jackson57]

The merit which is incumbent on them to prove is that Plame was a COVERT CIA Agent and her undercover status was blown as a result of her name being released. However, that point has already been disproven during the Libby trial. Just the fact that she is a CIA employee and her name was published with or without her permission is not a factor in this case. Does President Bush give his permission every time his name is published and does he have knowledge of it? Nope.

[muawiyah]

There's no evidence whatsoever that Plame is, was or was ever an "agent", nor if she was an "agent" that she was an "agent" as described under the relevant law.

If you have evidence that she is, was or was ever an "agent" as so described, please publish it here for our examination.

OK?!

[Lead Moderator]

Kiss your arse goodbye, troll.