Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Quorum Report Editor: Harvey Kronberg P.O. Box 8 Austin, Texas 78767 Voice: 512-292-8191 Fax: 512-292-0099 Email: kronberg@quorumreport.com May 8, 2008 2:59 PM ã Copyright May 8, 2008 by Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved

PATTERSON: PUBLIC OFFICIALS NEED TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION, ALL OF IT In a response to an FWST editorial from this morning, Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson explains why he continues to insist on the right to carry guns in the Christmas Mountains.

"I, Jerry Patterson, do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of Commissioner of the General Land Office of the State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God."

I understand that solemn oath as a commitment similar to the oath I took decades ago as an officer in the United States Marine Corps to "uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic". I do not regard such affirmations as mere anachronistic formalities. I feel compelled to uphold these commitments even at the risk of my political future in the case of the oath of office as Commissioner, or of my life in the case of my past career as a Marine.

You'll note that the above recitation DOES NOT STATE I "will preserve, protect, and defend the constitution and laws of the United States and of this state" ONLY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE DUTIES OF LAND COMMISSIONER.

The 2nd Amendment provides that, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Art 1 Sec 23 of the Bill of Rights of the Texas constitution also provides, "Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime."

Transferring 9,300 acres to an agency of the federal government that clearly ignores these constitutionally enumerated rights would simply violate my oath of office. I can only assume that the FWST believes elected officials should not be expected to comply with their oaths of office.

The FWST may consider my position "untenable" and my zeal for the Bill of Rights "obstinate" and an "obsession", but I couldn't care less. In my opinion, any elected or appointed official, at any level of government, lacking the same zeal and commitment to the U.S. and Texas constitutions should be subject to impeachment.

I guess you can just call me an old fashioned believer in the wisdom of those who penned the Bill of Rights and not much of a believer in the wisdom of editorial boards.

In the case of the FWST, its not even close.

Copyright May 8, 2008 by Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved

1 posted on 05/08/2008 9:55:36 PM PDT by lqcincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lqcincinnatus

Sounds like he’s on solid ground to me. Hopefully he’ll tell the *Telegram* to go pound sand.


2 posted on 05/08/2008 10:00:38 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Ted Kennedy - Codename -> "Bobber")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus
Stick to your guns Jerry! I'm sure the Startlegram editorial board will go apoplectic when this new regulation goes into effect.

Armed to kill in national parks?
christian science monitor ^ | Tue May 6, 4:00 AM ET | unknown

Posted on 5/8/2008 7:58:35 PM by Redcitizen

3 posted on 05/08/2008 10:04:48 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus

Not what I thought it might be. Kudos to Mr. Patterson!!!! HONOR THAT OATH!


4 posted on 05/08/2008 10:06:39 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus
It is way past time to move on. Let's get on with transferring the Christmas Mountains to the National Park Service and save the gun battle for another day

I'm opposed to donatating one square inch of Texas to the National Park Service. I'd rather that State of Texas own it.

5 posted on 05/08/2008 10:07:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus

Let’s take this one step further. Where in the Constitution is the authorization for the Park Service, or any other branch of the Federal Government to own the land.


6 posted on 05/08/2008 10:10:03 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus

He was right the first time. They should just sell the land.


7 posted on 05/08/2008 10:35:09 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus; VeniVidiVici; All

I don’t know about you, but that article was so poorly written I can barely tell where the guy stands on the Second Amendment. It sounds like the author is still in high school.


8 posted on 05/08/2008 11:22:05 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus

Whoever wrote this has never thought about the truth that it was guns that won this nation’s independence and made it the greatest nation on earth. It is still guns that keep the writer’s hind end safe and sound this very day, but if he or she wishes for a true gun free nation, let them moved to Myanmar where they may have the joy of life without any fear of guns in the hands of it citizens!


9 posted on 05/09/2008 4:23:11 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqcincinnatus
From another article, it sounds like adding the land to Big Bend is incredibly impracticable.
On Dec. 6, Sen. John Whitmire, D-Hous ton, appeared to give Patterson an out by suggesting he leave the matter to the next Legislature to solve, including extending public access. "There's really good news there," Patterson said. "At least he recognizes there's no access."
Out of the 19-mile perimeter, only one mile adjoins Big Bend; the rest is surrounded by private land. This, Patterson argued, would make access difficult enough, but the topography of the area makes it near impossible. There is no road access from Big Bend, and if there were, visitors would almost immediately be faced by the sheer cliff of Christmas Moun tain itself. While the ridge provides views of the park, from that side it is reachable only by experienced climbers. Patterson said locals were concerned that potential visitors would trespass along the privately owned road across Terlingua Ranch Estates to the east.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A575586
10 posted on 05/09/2008 8:27:24 PM PDT by gingeroni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson