Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NRA2BFree
I understand your point of view.
McCain can be confusing.

So, I have to view McCain through the prism of what he actually has done in regards to judges, and this judge, Ruth Ginsburg, late of the ACLU, is one that received his YES vote in the Senate to confirm.

80 posted on 05/08/2008 6:51:24 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952
Now that it's about 90% certain that McPain is going to face Obama in November, I sure hope he doesn't take his landslide as some sort of OK for proposing a liberal agenda...

We NEED a strong conservative Republican Congress. If McCainiac is heavily favored in the polls leading up to Election Day, how do we possibly convince people to vote GOP instead of Rat down-ballot?

88 posted on 05/08/2008 6:55:58 PM PDT by hunter112 (The 'straight talk express' gets the straight finger express from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

http://www.mailbucket.org/politickr-mccain-6260565.html

My Friends,

We have a lot at stake in this presidential election. As a nation, we face many challenges that will require real leadership from our next president. I have said before that this election will be about the big things, not the small things, and I write to you today about one big issue in particular - the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. If one of my Democratic opponents is elected in November, you can rest assured that given the opportunity to appoint judges, they will appoint those who make law with disregard for the will of the people.

There may be at least two vacancies on the United States Supreme Court during the next presidential term. As president, I will ensure that only those judges who strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States are appointed. I will nominate judges who understand that their role is to faithfully apply the law as written, not impose their will through judicial fiat.

If you want judges who will clearly and completely adhere to the Constitution of the United States and who do not legislate from the bench to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, then I ask that you join my campaign for president today by making a financial contribution.

I am proud to have played a role in the appointment and confirmation of two great Supreme Court justices - Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito I need your support now so that as your president I can nominate judges like Justices Roberts and Alito. Judges who have proven themselves worthy of our trust. Judges who take as their sole responsibility the enforcement of laws made by the people’s elected representatives. Judges who can be relied upon to respect the values of the people whose rights, laws and property they are sworn to defend.

My friends, the future of our country and of the Supreme Court is at stake in this election. If either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama is elected - both voted against confirming Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito - they will appoint activist judges. They will appoint judges who legislate from the bench.

I’m sure I don’t have to remind you how important even one vote on the Supreme Court can be. Issues concerning states’ rights, abortion, affirmative action, the Second Amendment and religious freedom have all been decided by a very slim 5-4 margin.

America needs a leader who recognizes that the people and the states should decide what’s best, not the courts. In order to be that leader, I need your financial support immediately.

Please follow this link to make an immediate donation of $50, $100, $250, $500, $1,000 - any amount up to the legal limit of $4,600.

Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,

John McCain


91 posted on 05/08/2008 7:02:01 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Obama's issues would be better resolved in a psychotherapists office, than in the Oval Office))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Ruth Ginsburg, late of the ACLU, is one that received his YES vote in the Senate to confirm.

Look, I dislike McCain as much as the next guy - but this is bogus.

The Ginsburg vote was taken back when the President's choice was almost always approved, as long as the applicant was qualified on paper. This was before the Dems started their eternal scorched-earth Judiciary hearings in the Senate. It seems like an eternity ago, I know.

You may hate Buzzy Ginsburg, but this is the way it is supposed to work. Bill Clinton won the election. She was qualified. He picked her. The way to not have her, was to win the Presidential election. McCain's vote to confirm her is the way it is supposed to work - the bloodbath should take place in the Presidential election, not in the Judiciary hearings.

You want to blame someone, blame me - I voted for Perot, and helped make the fiasco of the Clinton years possible.
164 posted on 05/09/2008 5:34:39 AM PDT by horse_doc (Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson