Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Williams
>That raving left wing lunatic was his answer to the kinds of judges he will appoint...

Question:

Would McCain appoint or vote for such a raving left wing lunatic?


49 posted on 05/08/2008 6:31:44 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952

No McCain wouldnt appoint her. Period.


55 posted on 05/08/2008 6:35:55 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Would McCain appoint or vote for such a raving left wing lunatic?

I sure hope not. He says he won't but I don't trust him. I guess I'm shell shocked and I have a hard time believing any of them these days!

That being said, we have a 50 - 50 chance of McCain appointing conservative to moderate SC Judges. With Hillary and Obama, they will be clones of Ginsberg, or worse. I will crawl across broken glass to vote against Hillary and Obama, and if that means I have to hold my nose and vote for McCain, then so be it.

To be perfectly honest, I'm more afraid of Obama's wife than I am of Hillary! That woman is a skank from Hell.

68 posted on 05/08/2008 6:42:46 PM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Would McCain appoint or vote for such a raving left wing lunatic?

Sadly, he did.

Republicans did not find Ginsburg to be a controversial nominee and on Thursday, July 29, 1993, the Judiciary Committee voted unanimously in favor of her confirmation, a mere six days after the hearings concluded. The Senate then approved Ginsburg's nomination by a vote of 96 to 3. The three dissenters were Conservative Republicans Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina), Don Nichols (sic) (R- Oklahoma), and Robert C. Smith (R-New Hampshire). Sen. Helms said he voted against her because of her position on abortion and the "homosexual agenda."

Source: http://hnn.us/articles/13357.html

143 posted on 05/08/2008 9:42:35 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

Just curious here: what do you think happened to Ruth's other tube sock?

182 posted on 05/09/2008 7:48:53 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Politicians cannot buy votes that are not for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson