[Free ThinkerNY]

[denydenydeny]

“We’ve got to make sure civil liberties are protected,”

Why is the right of citizens to be secure in their property (personal and real) never listed as a "civil liberty"?

[Eric Blair 2084]

You don't support Obama? Why? You don't believe in hope? The Future? The man is well qualified, he served in the IL State legislature 3 years ago. Who is he kidding? Americans are not that dumb....he won't win more than 10 states.

Come on, let's change the greatest country in the history of the planet Earth.

[Typical_Whitey]

Why doesn’t he just cap salary...that way Oprah, the hollywood crowd and the fortune 500 CEO’s can be told that 1 million is the limit everything else will be given to the government.... Maybe then the idiots will have second thoughts about supporting the Marxist.

[My Favorite Headache]

Oprah’s bank account is gonna take a nice hit with this one.

[ToastedHead]

LOL! What a dumbass. How is it possible that I am nobody, and I don’t know anything, and yet I am certain I would know better than to say the stupid things he does?

[headstamp 2]

“Obama replied, “You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough” and said “if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class…On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

Brilliant. Raise taxes on small business owners and entrepreneurs.

Marxist idiot.

[LayoutGuru2]

Bush Derangement Syndrome ... ROTFLMAO

[Ancesthntr]

“We’ve got to make sure civil liberties are protected,” Obama said. “Because oftentimes there are pressures placed on politicians to want to set civil liberties aside, especially at a time when we’ve had terrorist attacks.

I guess that means that Hussein won't be pushing for gun control. /acid-dripping sarcasm

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

Well, it looks like I better not work any overtime next year, if Obama wins, otherwise I’ll squeek over the line and run straight out of my middle classness.

[LowTaxesEqualProsperity]

Yes, Obama will make sure there are less Americans “doing well”, these are the people who create jobs and hire people who become middle class.

With less people “doing well”, there will also be less jobs and less middle class, and more underclass dependent on Obama.

It’s communism.

Obama is the great threat to this nation in its existence.

[RGSpincich]

if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class

This ass hat has no clue what is happening. The only hedge many of us so called "solidly" middle class folks have against high prices is our real estate investment. Obama says he wants to raise the long term capital gains tax to 28% almost doubling the existing tax. Meaning he is doubling the tax on the middle class if we try to outright sell our real estate investment. This goes for all other investments subject to long term capital gains tax, as well.

[Lady Heron]

So much for the American dream. Dems are disgusting, and McCain is only a step behind them.

The only bright spot in this worst election year I have ever seen....after 2 years of dems controlling the Hose, Senate and the Presidency there will be a landslide for the Republicans.

[weegee]

“you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine.”

We entered 2000 with a recession. We weren’t doing that well in the 1990s throughout the decade.

There was an internet stock bubble that did make some people money. Until they realized tulips like Pets.com and sock puppets weren’t worth anything.

[avacado]

Obama: "I Will Raise Taxes"

Lambchops, you ain't going to be President. Sit down and STFU!

[Bobarian]

Will someone PLEASE smack this fool with a Laffer Curve?

[OB1kNOb]

And to reiterate my tagline,

"We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election." - Ahmed Yousef, Hamas PM advisor"

[Creek Injun]

America is screwed no matter who wins. Liberal, globalist republicans raise taxes, too.

[skinkinthegrass]

Posted on 06/29/2004 9:12:49 AM EDT by kristinn Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton....(Marxist-socialist apparatchiks-Cuba), speaking at a Democratic party fundraiser in San Francisco yesterday, was remarkably frank about the Democrats' intentions to use socialist redistribution policies if the party gains power after the November elections. As reported by the Associated Press, Sen. Clinton said, "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." With her blunt statement, Sen. Clinton has drawn clear the difference between the two major parties: The Marxist Democratic party will "take things away from you on behalf of the common good" while the Republicans will defend your right to spend your money as you see fit because they know it's your money, not the government's. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1162267/posts

We're Screwed...need I say more.

[GourmetDan]

"On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

I know a bunch of cops and firefighters in Vallejo whose money-problems have just escalated. ;-)

[Red in Blue PA]

I’m starting to feel bitter.