Why are you covering for this marxist muslim?
Note, this is a simple question not an attack.
I'm not "covering" for him. Most of the Democrats I know say they'll sit out the election if he's the nominee - so there are plenty of problems with him as a nominee without making things up.
I won't dispute that he's a marxist, but I'm wondering why FReepers are (1) taking for granted that he will be elected, (2) assuming he'll want to enact any kind of religious law -- that seems rather counter-productive for a Marxist, doesn't it? and (3) suggesting he's a Muslim when there's little or no evidence to suggest that, and a fair bit to suggest otherwise.