Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
nobody is going to read though all of that.

condense and annotate.

4 posted on 05/08/2008 1:09:22 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952
nobody is going to read though all of that.

I didn't.

*embarrassed to admit it*

6 posted on 05/08/2008 1:12:58 PM PDT by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

You really should read the entire thing when you have time. It’s worth it and important.


18 posted on 05/08/2008 1:48:23 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

“condense and annotate.”

Obama is a socialist, trained in socialist policies and political activism.

Obama was trained by the Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago and worked for an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of “a more just and democratic society” is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method.:”

Obama’s campaign is replete with riffs on socialist themes.

It is ‘dog-whistling’ - telling the lefties and radicals what they want to hear, without alerting the rest of us to its latent radicalism.

Like the “Yes, we can” its “Si se peude!” from Cesar Chavez’ union, so to most ignorant Americans it sound like good old-fashioned American can-do spirit, but to leftist agitators its a signal - “Hey, I’m a fellow traveller, yes we CAN move the country left.”

Similarly, he used the words of Malcolm X to black audiences.


20 posted on 05/08/2008 1:56:55 PM PDT by WOSG (Gameplan: Obama beats Hillary, McCain beats Obama, conservatives beat RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
condense and annotate.

Or Deconstruct. :^)

The short answer: Obama is a commie.

25 posted on 05/08/2008 2:22:51 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Important to most should be the key eplaination offered as to the difference between liberals and radical. The next to paragraphs explain it well.

“Alinsky had no patience for those he called the liberals of his day—people who were content to talk about the changes they wanted, but were unwilling to actively work for those changes. Rather, he favored “radicals” who were prepared to take bold, decisive action designed to transform society, even if that transformation could be achieved only slowly and incrementally. Wrote Alinsky:

LIBERALS FEAR power or its application.… They TALK glibly of people lifting themselves by their own bootstraps but fail to realize that nothing can be lifted except through power…RADICALS PRECIPITATE THE SOCIAL CRISIS BY ACTION…BY USING POWER. LIBERALS PROTEST; RADICALS REBEL. LIBERALS BECOME INDIGNANT; RADICALS BECOME FIGHTING MAD AND GO INTO ACTION. Liberals do not modify their personal lives[,] and what they give to a cause is a small part of their lives; radicals give themselves to the cause. Liberals give and take oral arguments; radicals give and take the hard, dirty, bitter way of life.”

35 posted on 05/08/2008 3:08:05 PM PDT by JSteff (This election is NOT a presidential only. 3 to 5 Supremes will retire! Vote accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson