Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge tells EPA to get moving on carbon monoxide safety
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/7/8 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 05/07/2008 4:47:19 PM PDT by SmithL

SAN FRANCISCO -- The Bush administration has violated legal deadlines for updating the nation's clean-air standards on carbon monoxide, a federal judge in San Francisco has ruled.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White told the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday to follow a schedule that would allow a full scientific review, public comment and any proposed changes in the standard to take place by May 2011. The EPA had proposed a timetable that would extend through October 2012.

Carbon monoxide, an odorless and invisible byproduct of incomplete combustion in auto exhaust, refinery fumes and other emissions of fossil fuels, is lethal at high levels and can cause health problems and birth defects at lower levels. It is one of the pollutants for which the EPA sets a nationwide standard, requiring states to devise their own plans for compliance.

The current national standard was set in 1971. Federal law requires a reassessment every five years, but the EPA last reviewed the standard in 1994 and made no changes, said Shana Lazerow, a lawyer for Communities for a Better Environment, one of the groups that sued the federal agency.

Environmental groups in the lawsuit said recent scientific studies have found that carbon monoxide is dangerous at levels that were previously considered safe. They said two reports in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, published in 2001 and 2005, both found low birth weights among children born to women who were exposed to carbon monoxide at levels far below those allowed by the 1971 standard.

"Current health standards allow our children to be exposed to dangerous levels of carbon monoxide across the country," said Jeremy Nichols, director of Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action, another plaintiff in the case.

Lazerow said studies also show that poor and minority children are most at risk.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 9thcircus; activistjudge; carbonmonoxide; epa; powermadjudge

1 posted on 05/07/2008 4:47:19 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Lazerow said studies also show that poor and minority children are most at risk.

It just writes itself....

As a major producer of CO2, CO, and (mostly) Methane.... poor children are not allowed in my house. In fact, my grandchildren aren't allowed in my house until they have passed a firearm safety course.

/johnny

2 posted on 05/07/2008 4:53:14 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The EPA is too busy dealing with the lawsuits forcing it to act on the B.S. threat of carbon dioxide & GoreBullWarming. Why should it deal with a gas (CO) that actually has killed real people? [/s]
3 posted on 05/07/2008 4:53:57 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why are poor and minority children more at risk? Does this bill mean that poor single parent mom’s and illegal aliens get free exhaust system repairs on their beater cars?


4 posted on 05/07/2008 5:03:26 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

They really should deal with rusty hydrogen first! /tinfoil


5 posted on 05/07/2008 5:04:01 PM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Free mufflers for everyone!!!!!!


6 posted on 05/07/2008 5:16:20 PM PDT by Gator113 (Obama is a member of the Far Wright Conspiracy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

District Judge Jeffrey White told the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday to follow a schedule that would allow a full scientific review..

LOL! Or what? Take a hike, schmo.


7 posted on 05/07/2008 5:21:45 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Federal law requires a reassessment every five years, but the EPA last reviewed the standard in 1994 and made no changes, said Shana Lazerow, a lawyer for Communities for a Better Environment, one of the groups that sued the federal agency.

First, if 1994 was the LAST time they reviewed the standard, why NOW? (I know the answer, to help the Rat presidential candidate).

Second, maybe (most likely) if the 1994 review under a RAT administration produced no changes in the standard, there shouldn't be a change even now. Sometimes the best action is no action.

8 posted on 05/07/2008 5:21:59 PM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Isn’t there some kind of intelligence test that people need to pass before they’re allowed to be a judge? I guess not as evidenced by the continuous barrage of stupid decisions that these leftist morons continue to make.


9 posted on 05/07/2008 5:25:42 PM PDT by meyer (Still conservative, no longer Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Stay tuned for next week’s episode of “Ninth Jerk-it Court of Schlemiels”, which will rule on the deadly DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE!


10 posted on 05/07/2008 5:42:44 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel
First, if 1994 was the LAST time they reviewed the standard, why NOW? (I know the answer, to help the Rat presidential candidate).

Federal law (CAA) requires that the standards be reviewed and if appropriate, changed every five years. The root of this problem is the law, not the agency (though they are a source of plenty of problems on their own). The law (the Clean Air Act) needs to be changed.

The process is completely broken, and changes to the CAA will not save a single life from a CO leak in a furnace or space heater...

11 posted on 05/07/2008 7:02:03 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

White, Jeffrey Steven
Born 1945 in New York, NY

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by George W. Bush on July 25, 2002, to a seat vacated by Charles E. Legge; Confirmed by the Senate on November 14, 2002, and received commission on November 15, 2002.

Education:
Queens College of City University of New York, B.A., 1967

State University of New York, J.D., 1970

Professional Career:
Attorney, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1970-1971
Assistant U.S. attorney, District of Maryland, 1971-1977
Attorney, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1977-1978
Private practice, San Francisco, California, 1978-2002

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male

12 posted on 05/07/2008 7:45:53 PM PDT by SmithL (Reject Obama's Half-Vast Wright-Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson