Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockinRight

No such things as accidents.

If she was operating over the posted speed limit it is manslaughter/murder. I am sure the officer did not bound from between two cars. More than likely he checked her speed by radar from a distance and stepped out and began to wave and draw attention. Most departments also require florescent vests in traffic.

Women was driving too fast no doubt with head up rear and probably talking or texting. Had this been a bank robber fleeing or child molester they would have been lynched ( figuratively speaking ). No difference.


7 posted on 05/07/2008 2:15:17 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Resolute Conservative

All I meant was that if the killing wasn’t intentional, it was an accident. I’m speaking practical definition, not legal.


8 posted on 05/07/2008 2:18:18 PM PDT by RockinRight (Supreme Court Justice Fred Thompson. The next best place for Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative

Oh, and this was on Route 32. Right by where I used to live - EVERYONE goes 70+ on that highway. It’s a 4-6 lane expressway, it’s not a “side road.”


9 posted on 05/07/2008 2:19:01 PM PDT by RockinRight (Supreme Court Justice Fred Thompson. The next best place for Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative
If she was operating over the posted speed limit it is manslaughter/murder.

True.

10 posted on 05/07/2008 2:22:54 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative

Manslaughter charges for being a few miles over the speed limit? That is ridiculous. If the cop stepped in front of a vehicle on the road, I don’t care how fast they were going, the burden of responsiblity for him getting killed rests with him.....


15 posted on 05/07/2008 2:33:14 PM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative
No such things as accidents.

You're right. There are no such things as accidents.

And if the officer didn't step in front of a moving vehicle, he'd be alive today.

This type of law enforcement strategy is designed to generate a huge number of speeding tickets (and thus revenue) in a short amount of time with minimal effort. Well, it cost one officer his life.

Any 6 year old knows that stepping in front of moving vehicles is dangerous. Sadly, the desire for ticket revenue blinded them to the obvious safety risks inherent in such an operation.

17 posted on 05/07/2008 2:40:18 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative
If she was operating over the posted speed limit it is manslaughter/murder. I am sure the officer did not bound from between two cars. More than likely he checked her speed by radar from a distance and stepped out and began to wave and draw attention. Most departments also require florescent vests in traffic.

The grand jury failed to indict her. The grand jury used a very low bar for evidence that a crime was committed before indicting.

That would seem to indicate that he likely did step out in front of her when she didn't have enough time to stop.

If she had time to stop, or should have been able to stop if she were going more slowly, then I would agree that it was manslaughter. However, if that were the case you would think he would also have had plenty of time to realize she wasn't going to stop in time and would have gotten out of the lane she was driving in.

A car does approach pretty quickly at 71 MPH, but it should be obvious in plenty of time to get out of the way that she isn't slowing down quickly enough to stop before she reached him.

18 posted on 05/07/2008 2:42:21 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative
If she was operating over the posted speed limit it is manslaughter/murder

I'd go with assisted suicide. Don't stand in front of speeding cars.

38 posted on 05/07/2008 3:18:03 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative

http://blogs.knoxnews.com/knx/silence/archives/2007/05/video_of_me_bre.shtml

The 55 mph speed limit on most Interstate highways is a joke.


40 posted on 05/07/2008 3:21:46 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative

“If she was operating over the posted speed limit it is manslaughter/murder.”

There was no malice aforethought.


54 posted on 05/07/2008 3:59:17 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Resolute Conservative
No such things as accidents.

God bless you for saying that.

Negligent acts, yes. Intentional acts, yes. Acts of God, yes.

Accidents, no.

115 posted on 05/08/2008 4:27:15 PM PDT by Crawdad (If you're in a fair fight, your tactics suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson