You’re confused. You think that when someone’s case is adjudicated that people are unable to profer up their opinion on whether they believe that adjudication was appropriate or not. In other words, you are inferring that I do not have any right to voice an opinion on this one point regarding this incident. I respecfully disagree with your position. There is nothing that prevents me or anyone else with profering a dissenting opinion regarding the outcome of such situations as this. Since it is nothing more than an opinion, and holds no weight with respect to that outcome, there is nothing here you can lay claim to with respect to my being unable to “accept” consequences. Unless, of course, you have the position that people have to right to voice their opinion, which would suggest you are against forums such as FR.
ping
I'm not confused.
I merely note that you've huffed and puffed around here about folks “accepting consequences” and it seems that this woman has accepted the consequences for her actions. She's paid her fine.
You're quite unhappy with the fact that they didn't throw her in jail on felony counts, and go flouncing around ever more about “consequences.” LOL.
The problem is that YOU'RE the one unable to deal with the fact that this lady committed no felony, nothing worse than a moderate traffic violation.
The reality is that the consequences in Maryland for driving 16 mph over the speed limit are to pay a $300 ticket, give or take.
sitetest