Posted on 05/07/2008 11:04:44 AM PDT by Darren McCarty
I sound like a broken record here, but John Paul Stevens is 88 years old, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 75. They will likely retire soon. McCain voted for Thomas, Alito, and Roberts. Obama and Clinton voted against Roberts and voted to fillibuster Alito. We may get good judges from McCain. We will NOT get good judges from Clinton. We will get Breyers and Ginsburgs from them.
That is why I will hold my nose and vote for McCain in November.
I understand McCain supports La Raza and the overthrow of the US govt. How does this square with him running for President of said country - doesn’t make sense.
Thanks for positing! A good speach from mcCain. Obama will appoint people in the ilk of Reverend Wright.
Everyone should be very afraid of letting Obama anywhere near the White House....even if it requires the purchase of clothes-pins!
“I will look for accomplished men and women with a proven record of excellence in the law, and a proven commitment to judicial restraint.”
There is a clear distinction here between McCain the other two on this very crucial issue - a clear enough distinction that should make any conservative think twice about sitting this one out or voting third party.
Time for that will come later.
Thank you for posting.
I understand McCain bashing is a sport among whiney drama queens who are still fighting the last war (nomination) and like to hijack threads.
Enjoy the next 4 years of the Worst President Ever:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121012911766473091.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks
McCain doesn’t support he overthrow of the US Govt.
bump for later reading
Holding my nose here, also, which is hard to do while you’re crawling over broken glass. However, I agree that SCOTUS is too important to play with, and the fact that all three branches will be in the dems hands for a couple of years until the mid-terms, means that they can pretty much do what they will, and approve whoever they want. We stand a better change of getting someone who at least will not believe that the constitution ‘lives and breathes’ if McCain is elected, and we learned pretty quickly with the Miers debacle exactly how loud our voices can be if we have to make sure we are heard.
Words are cheap.
His actions in cozying up to La Raza and embracing their agenda of destroying our borders speak volumes.
McCain - should he be elevated - will not get his snot past a democrat controlled Congress on this subject.
Zero.
Nada.
Nothing.
mark
McCain can make all the speeches he wants regarding the TYPE of Supreme Court justice he wants to nominate. And right after they get turned down by a Democrat controlled Senate, he’ll back down, reach across the aisle, and give us another Souter.
Put up your proof or shut up your piehole.
It reads like a Reagan speech.
1. Gang of Fourteen (Got some of President Bushs best judges presented for a vote)
2. McCain-Bush
3. McCain-Bush
4. Nice ticket
5. Smart enough to not allow the Democrats to demogogue an issue that resonates with a majority of voters.
6. No one’s perfect
7. Admiral Mullen, Secretary Gates
8. Never heard of them
9. Hey it’s better than Gun-Owners of America
10. Yep that means at his worst he agrees with conservatives 65% of the time (82% lifetime)- not 33% as you claim elsewhere.
The Rest. Who cares? What a bore.
Bet you didn’t read the speech.
I held my nose and voted for Bush for the same reason, and I was not dissapointed. Of course, we really had to hold his feet to the fire with the Harriet Myers debacle, but all's well that ends well. I suspect that if he gets elected, we might have to hold McCain's feet to the fire a few times as well. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.