Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trussell; burroak
If the other party has insurance that will cover their liability, they should turn the suit over to their insurance and let them handle it.

If the other party doesn’t have insurance to cover it, it becomes a civil suit between two individuals.

Exactly! It is that simple!

Burroak clearly does not know what he is talking about.

163 posted on 05/08/2008 6:08:20 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

“Burroak clearly does not know what he is talking about.”

I’ve lived long enough and voted against my self interest for the better part of 40 years.

I clearly know what it means to live a moral and ethical life, and driving without C/C coverage and using the savings to do whatever and expecting others to pony up is basely duplicitous.

I’ll wager that you would not let you child see you shoplift an item; but you will not only brag about how you can driver a junker without C/C coverage so you can spend the savings on “fun” stuff, but you will educate him to how the system works.

As Willie Nelson said about the groupies that hung around his early tours, “Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.”

Judging from your post, I can see that you clearly don’t understand what I’m talking about either.


167 posted on 05/08/2008 6:28:00 AM PDT by burroak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson