Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Stories like this make my stomach turn.
1 posted on 05/07/2008 6:37:34 AM PDT by Dan Nunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: holdonnow

Ping


2 posted on 05/07/2008 6:38:24 AM PDT by Dan Nunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

A 13 pound dog does $1,100 in damages?! Me thinks Jeffery Ely needs to just man up, file an insurance claim and move on.


3 posted on 05/07/2008 6:39:13 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

This isn’t about the dog, it’s about the owner.


7 posted on 05/07/2008 6:45:19 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns donÂ’t kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
when Fester, a miniature pinscher, squeezed past owner Nikki Munthe as she was letting in her other dog and ran out onto the road.

Why does she let her other roam around in the front yard? As far as the damages to the car, he must have been going pretty fast that a 13 pound dog made it possible for the bumer to have gone through the radiator.

8 posted on 05/07/2008 6:45:38 AM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

I’m glad the owners of the dog are countersuing him. I hope they win.


11 posted on 05/07/2008 6:53:13 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
Stories like this make my stomach turn.

Yeah, me too. I can't stand irresponsible pet owners.

16 posted on 05/07/2008 6:58:27 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

The owner is responsible for the damages done by his animal. Grit your teeth, pay the bill, and move on.

The simple way to avoid such liability is to not have a dog. To me, they are worth the price, and I will pay for the damage they might do.


25 posted on 05/07/2008 7:04:11 AM PDT by gridlock (The natural state of the world is Darfur. The freakish aberration is America - - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

Ranchers know that they will be held liable if their animals wander into traffic. This is old and established law.

Don’t know why it would be different for loose pets.


37 posted on 05/07/2008 7:16:30 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
I am a dog owner and lover and in this case I think they owners are responsible for damages however I do question the claim by this man on the amount of damage..... IMO he is looking to get some pre existing problems fixed
39 posted on 05/07/2008 7:17:20 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

The dog should not have been on the road, the car should have. The dog owners are responsible.

Now if the dog were on a leash on the sidewalk and the guy ran it over, he would not have an argument.

Dogs do not belong in the road, and it’s the owners fault that it was and their dog damaged someone’s property because the dog owner’s carelessness made the street unsafe for motorists.

Dog lovers think that dogs can do no wrong.
In this case, the dog owner is responsible for keeping the dog off of thoroughfares used by motorists. The owner was incompetent and should pay for damage their neglect and carelessness caused.


42 posted on 05/07/2008 7:19:47 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
First, note that the $1,100 includes time taken off from two jobs.

Second, note that this report is from yankeeland.

44 posted on 05/07/2008 7:20:47 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

I’m not for suing, but I would. The driver of the car is out maybe $500 for his deductible. Why should he have to pay for his deductible and possibly get his insurance premiums hiked because some dog owner can’t keep his dog in check?


45 posted on 05/07/2008 7:20:59 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

Is he suing, or is the insurance company suing in his name?


49 posted on 05/07/2008 7:25:22 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

My elderly neighbor was hit by a car crossing the street in front of our apartment building. The man who hit him sent my neighbor a certified letter requesting payment for the damage to his automobile. The old man has been in the hospital since it happened.


50 posted on 05/07/2008 7:27:41 AM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (I'd rather be single than wish I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn; mgc1122; benjamin032; MEGoody; Red Badger; Bon mots
Pieces of the bumper were propelled into the radiator when it hit the dog, Ely said, necessitating a replacement.

So just how far over the speed limit was Mr. Ely driving, on a residential street? Remember, this was a 13 pound dog. And how closely was he paying attention to the road? He could just as easily have hit a child who darted into the road. Seems to me there's a reckless driving conviction waiting to happen here. And then a suit from the dog owners for the loss of their dog plus intentional infliction of emotional distress for suing them over the damage to his car!

What a loser. One can only hope he has reason to apply for a new job in the relatively near future. Employers pretty routinely Google the names of potential hires these days. This guy's employment prospects would be toast.

51 posted on 05/07/2008 7:28:41 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
Stories like this make my stomach turn.

They make my stomach turn, also, but probably not for the same reason. My husband broke an axle and came close to flipping his truck to avoid a dog in traffic. He loves animals, but after that experience, if it's him (or causing an accident for others), then the dog gets hit.

The owner should be grateful that the driver didn't swerve and possibly injure himself to avoid the dog. People are more important than animals, and yes, I have a dog that I love, but it's my responsibility to keep her safe and not let her be the cause of injury or damage to others.

52 posted on 05/07/2008 7:29:12 AM PDT by browardchad ("We are all mavericks now." -- Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
"Stories like this make my stomach turn. "

Ditto. That's liberal land there. The guy's car was a POS that was already falling apart. The dog is tiny and would have fit right under a sound vehicle, w/o causing any damage at all.

54 posted on 05/07/2008 7:30:49 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn
To those of you who think a 13 lb dog can't cause 1100 bucks of damage to a car, my wife hit a 5lb pheasant and did 600 bucks worth and this was 20 years ago when prices were a lot lower. $1100 is quite easy to sustain in today's inflated economy. The owner of the dog should be responsible, owners of livestock have always been liable for damage to cars, why not dog owners?

They are not sacred and I am glad this guy is going to court over this, the owner of said dog should have paid up without a squawk since her dog caused the accident due to her carelessness.

We(FReepers)are always talking about taking responsibility for one's actions but some of us think that doesn't apply when it is a dog(or name of your favorite animal here)owner that needs to suck it up and own up to their obligations.

55 posted on 05/07/2008 7:32:26 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

I know.

Owners should be responsible for their animals and the damage they cause.

The family shoud pay up ASAP.


58 posted on 05/07/2008 7:39:06 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Nunn

Why?

The dog was the responsibility of the owner, the dog damaged another persons property. The owner of the dog is responsible for that damage.

There is nothing stomach turning about it.


59 posted on 05/07/2008 7:41:03 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson