Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luke21

I personally saw no less than three posts last night (by different FReepers)during primary results that openly said they wanted the Clintons in for eight more years because they were the best choice of the three.


34 posted on 05/07/2008 6:31:41 AM PDT by The Ghost of Rudy McRomney (Using Hillary to nip Obama's heels is like beating a dead horse with an armed nuclear bomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
they wanted the Clintons in for eight more years because they were the best choice of the three.

IF - and this is speaking strictly hypothetically - IF Hillary! would stick to all of her campaign promises (tough on illegals, tough on terror, tough on crime and we'll just sort of kick that socialized medicine thing under the rug for now)....then I think that she'd be a decent choice.

I know that she's lying, though, (how? her mouth is open....) so she doesn't get my vote. It speaks volumes to me though, that Hillary! can run to the right of the Republican party and beat them at their own game.

That's why, IMHO, she was much more dangerous than Obama would ever be. Hillary! was the quintessential wolf-in-sheep's-clothing. Glad to see that her campaign is more-or-less over.

41 posted on 05/07/2008 8:17:13 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson