Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 10 reasons McCain should repudiate the National Council of La Raza
Michelle Malkin ^ | 05/06/2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/06/2008 10:01:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I told you yesterday about John McCain’s plans to speak to the National Council of La Raza (The Race) in July. Here are the top 10 reasons he should repudiate the radical open borders, speech-squelching group that he has long embraced:

10. La Raza supports driver’s licenses for illegal aliens.

9. La Raza supports in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding US citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.

8. La Raza opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state, and federal authorities.

7. La Raza sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars, including the “Aztlan Academy” in Tucson, AZ, the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, AZ, and Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn.

6. La Raza gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), which the late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized as “a radical racist group…[and] one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West.”

5. La Raza opposes a secure fence on the southern border.

4. Former La Raza president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton’s Hispanic outreach advisor said this:

“US English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks.” He was referring to US English the nation’s oldest, largest citizens’ action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States.

La Raza also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms “illegal” and “amnesty.”

3. La Raza is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable TV networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves–in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes.

2. La Raza has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.

1. The National Council of La Raza means The National Council of “The Race,” for God’s sake.

Their signature slogan, chanted at pro-illegal alien rallies from coast to coast, is “La raza unida nunca sera vencida.”

“A united [Hispanic] race will never be defeated.”

What possible good will come out of a GOP presidential candidate giving legitimacy and credibility to a sovereignty-undermining, assimilation-rejecting, law-defying group that calls itself “The Race?”

***

Victor Davis Hanson:

"I agree that John McCain should not attend any conference of a group called “National Council of the Race.” In a multiracial society, Rev. Wright’s “rich white folks,” Obama’s “typical white person”, and clingers comments, and the idea of “The Race” will eventually doom us all. And it’s time no one gets a pass any more."

Jonathan Martin cluelessly suggests that McCain is “trying to show that he’s not George W. Bush by going into the lion’s den and taking hostile, unscripted questions from adversarial groups.”

Hostile? Adversarial? Do your homework, MSM.

McCain was honored by The Race in 1999, keynoted The Race’s 2004 conference, and has championed their agenda for years.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; elections; immigrantlist; juanmccain; laraza; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last
To: Bob J; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; rmlew; Jay Redhawk

Though I, too think BobJ is lost in the woods on this one, I suggest y’all tone it down, especially the one who’s been here a whole three months. BobJ is unquestionably a patriot, a definite conservative and an unswerving supporter of FR. Questioning his motives is equivalent to questioning the motives of somebody like Kristinn or Tonk, or Kent—though I do question why Kent keeps one of Liberace’s hands in his house, immersed in formaldehyde. Never his motives, though.


61 posted on 05/06/2008 12:24:35 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I don't know if we have all the information on this - Michelle's frequent bouts of hysteria do not lend themselves to unquestioning acceptance of her proffered take on a given subject.

Michelle, the fence is well along; and, no, Michelle, we are not going to issue drivers licenses to illegals - as Hillary and (former) NY governor, Spitzer belatedly got through their heads.

That said - If McCain can engage with a radical Hispanic group as this to discourage the members from radicalism, so much more the power to him.

To pretend that such groups and movements don't exist, or that they should be ignored, is only going to sharpen their radicalism. And very probably increase their propensity to secrecy.

Remember this: If such groups were to ally with Islamic Jihadists - as undoubtedly some in them would like to do - our national security problems, as big as they are now, would expand immensely.

62 posted on 05/06/2008 12:25:02 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Nothing to "tone down," on my part. Whether Bob J is, as you say, "a definite conservative" or no -- and that's not a call any one of here is any more qualified to make than the next one -- he posted an apologia on behalf of an openly racist group. If JimRob were to see it, he'd have it yanked in a heartbeat. None of that's even decently debatable, in the final analysis.

Called him on it; would readily do so, again; and won't be losing any sleep over it, now or at any point in the forseeable future. Post racist crap on the Free Republic boards... and you very definitely do so at your own risk. A word to the wise, for one and all, as it were.

And I'd never question your motives, neither, Kal. ;)

63 posted on 05/06/2008 12:32:59 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3

“To pretend that such groups and movements don’t exist, or that they should be ignored, is only going to sharpen their radicalism. And very probably increase their propensity to secrecy.”

Sane analysis. And rare...


64 posted on 05/06/2008 12:35:34 PM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3
Michelle's frequent bouts of hysteria

Stopped right there.

Sorry... but: anyone characterizing Michelle Malkin as being prone to "frequent bouts of hysteria" simply isn't familiar enough with the woman's work, IMHO, to pass summary judgment on same.

List 'em, please.

65 posted on 05/06/2008 12:37:06 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

For the most part, I responded to you so it wouldn’t be a glaring omission when I left you out.

BTW, bring some Oreos up with you the next time you pull Watchtower duty. We ran out three days ago and J’onn’s starting to get irritable.


66 posted on 05/06/2008 12:39:07 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Thanks for helping me prove my point that it is the GOPers that are trying to enforce “group think.”
67 posted on 05/06/2008 12:41:06 PM PDT by Jay Redhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
BTW, bring some Oreos up with you the next time you pull Watchtower duty. We ran out three days ago and J’onn’s starting to get irritable.

Huh. He thinks he has it bad now? Guess who's slated for a dirt nap, in the upcoming Final Crisis...?

(... and, no: NOT kidding.)

68 posted on 05/06/2008 12:41:53 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; mtntop3
List 'em, please.

Seconded!

In the interest of open discourse, I hereby note that I'm expecting a list of "hysterical" incidents where Malkin called for our nation to enact or enforce rational immigration laws. How freakish of her.

69 posted on 05/06/2008 12:42:24 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3
That said - If McCain can engage with a radical Hispanic group as this to discourage the members from radicalism, so much more the power to him.

Serious question: Would you write the same thing if McCain was appearing at a KKK rally?

70 posted on 05/06/2008 12:44:12 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron

“I’ll not vote for McCain.
I’ll write-in or vote the CP but there are too
many important, local elections to stay home.”

Same here!


71 posted on 05/06/2008 12:47:48 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (McCain will send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

If someone said that McCain should go talk to the KKK for the same reason, would you call it sane analysis?


72 posted on 05/06/2008 12:47:58 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Bobster, look, we can read and we all know somethings. Fur shur if "La Raza" was invented by a Mexican then it means "The Race" ~ ain't no two ways about it.

That explanation you C&Pd is just garbage.

73 posted on 05/06/2008 12:50:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jay Redhawk

Ah, but you see, I did no such thing. I called for people to have some respect for a longtime FR poster who’s been very devoted to promoting and preserving this site, and did so after making it clear I disagreed with his premise.

If you’re going to accuse me of something, it helps if the accusaton is credible.

Oh, and it’s probably best if you don’t pretend you know the players, when you haven’t even been here three months yet. BobJ was here ten years before you, and has spent that time promoting conservatism.


74 posted on 05/06/2008 12:51:44 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
So the guys on the other side are now "thugs".

Bobster, that's so mean spirited of you.

75 posted on 05/06/2008 12:53:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Aw jeez, they can’t kill J’onn, he’s the Jolly Green Buddha!

Really, I know it’s unrealistic for superheroes to basically be immortal, but...

1. Comics aren’t supposed to be realistic, it’s people flying around in spandex shooting beams out of their eyes for pity’s sake.

2. Once you’ve killed Superman it’s pretty much been done, you know? Ditto if Captain America and Tony Stark take the dirt nap.


76 posted on 05/06/2008 12:54:52 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Questions for you in post 58.


77 posted on 05/06/2008 12:55:43 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
I see a lot of disgust for McCain on this forum.

Fine.

Don't vote for him.

But for Heaven's sake, don't stay home.

One third of the United States Senate is up for re-election this year.

The entire House of Representatives is up for re-election this year.

State offices, local offices, and ballot issues abound.

Please: Show up. Vote on those matters.

Don't (literally) stay home.

78 posted on 05/06/2008 12:56:14 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Recalling that the KKK was down on Negros, Catholics and Jews, I'd say the "comparison" is rather incomplete, and probably not doable.

Folks keep forgetting that Catholics part of the deal.

79 posted on 05/06/2008 12:56:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I think Obamasama wants to limit wiretaps to the NRA and RNC ~ beyond that he doesn’t really care.


80 posted on 05/06/2008 12:59:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson