Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

“Why such vehemence in defense of a nest of pedophiles and polygamists?”

1.The mothers and children are not pedophiles.

2.The basis of your fears regarding their future are unfounded. Since you have nothing more than some drunkard’s alcoholic psychosis to believe they might disappear if they return home.


309 posted on 05/08/2008 11:07:17 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (shshshsh, the sheeple are sleeping and do not wish to be disturbed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]


To: takenoprisoner

Some of the mothers are enablers of pedophiles. Some of the children are victims.

Since there was so much deceit about the names, ages and family relationships, it was impossible to tell which were which at the time the children were removed from the cult compound. The DNA and Attorney General Abbott will help the court sort it out, since the adults from the cult didn’t seem willing.

The “bishop’s record” notes that some women and children are in a “house of hiding.” http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695275970,00.html

“”The March 2007 papers list the names of men, their wives, their children and the ages of each of them. A handful of young women, ages 16 and 17, are listed as wives of men in their 20s, 30s and 40s. Others are married to men closer in age. Some women, the records show, live in a “house of hiding.””


316 posted on 05/09/2008 6:37:32 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson