Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

“You’ve brought up the point few have noticed: the potential that the women and children might become hostages.”

I already consider them hostages. Afterall, they are in state custody.

While some might consider the word of a CPS worker as the gospel, obviously I am not one of them.

What the state seeks to do in this case is to re-indoctrinate these children into a new secular environment.
I am confident you are aware of this. Does this not give you pause?

Here they will learn having two mommies or two daddies is perfectly ok. (Just not having one daddy with multiple mommies...that is bad bad bad.) They will learn how to use a condom to aid in the prevention of STDs. They will learn how to utilize birth control products and methods. They will learn how they can have an abortion if the products and methods should fail, or they failed to use them properly. They will learn the proper use of slang and other vulgarities of the secular world. They will experience the use of illicit drugs and alcohol.

Of course, under the guidance of the secular proxy mommies and daddies some may go on to receive a proper education to lead a prosperous, productive, and happy life. But then others may become drug addicted prostitutes on some sleazey urban street. We both know there is no way to accurately predict their outcome. If the state has the perfect formula, then we should all be turning our children over to the state for a proper outcome. But we all know the state is morbidly as well as morally deficient in this regard.

Finally, while many are convinced these children are being sexually abused simply based on what CPS workers contend, thus far, the state has failed to charge anyone for anything. It’s been over a month now. What’s the problem? The problem is the state has overreached seizing hostages to fish for a party or parties willing to claim abuse. Surely we can expect someone at sometime will be charged with something to justify this act of terrorism upon women and children.


290 posted on 05/07/2008 10:33:30 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (shshshsh, the sheeple are sleeping and do not wish to be disturbed,,,oh, nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: takenoprisoner

The State has a minimum age of consent, in order to protect minors from sexual predators.

The State has also defined marriage as between one man, one woman. We passed a Constitutional amendment by over 70% in 2005 to protect long-standing law from judicial fiat.

There is at least one 14 year old girl who was removed from the cult compound and who is currently pregnant and in a shelter. Other minors have one or more children. On the day that they were removed, several girls - interviewed with permission of the cult leaders - independently told the same story about arranged marriages, polygamy, and under age sexual assault.

The hearings for the individual children begin in a little over a week, I believe. As the parentage is sorted out in spite of the lies on the day the children were removed from the cult compound, and since, about names, ages, and family relationships, you should have your arrests.

If the “marriages” are legal and there is no child sexual assault, there was no need for the deceit about names, ages, and parentage. Instead, the adults lied. They are the ones responsible for creating this mess.


301 posted on 05/08/2008 5:42:14 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson