There are many Mugabee wannabees on these threads busy defending the power and the will of the state to seize and imprison children. It doesn’t seem to bother them since they are not personally affected thus far. Some are socialists with a Marxist lean who will defend anything the state does no matter what. Others are simply too blind and too stupid to realize the implications when the state seizes and imprisons children enmasse.
Michael Savage is dead on balls accurate in his assessment of this family massacre by stormtrooping jack booted thugs.
Where do they find these people anyway? How were they indoctrinated? How can an Americans with weapons of mass destruction be trained to hold at bay unarmed, uncharged, and unconvicted, American mothers and children. What sort of childhood experience did they have that they could hate mothers and children with such rage that they could do them this way? Or is it they are simply indoctrinated to react to the commands of their superiors without question no matter what?
It is fascinating to watch, I can’t put the remote down so to speak. Anyone questioning the government is basically a heretic to that revered God for some, and considered vile and repulsive. I for one certainly don’t condone the accusations or the alleged behavior, but we all have protections or should have protections from an intrusive government.
I think it is perfectly fine to question the actions especially since we don’t have all the facts, nor have there been any arrests associated with the accusations. I feel better that the arrangement with the children is temporary during an investigation process, and I also think that many here putting government ahead of individual liberty and the basic tenants of the constitution are going to be disappointed when most of the children are sent home.
I am not saying those decisions are right or wrong or in the best interests of the children, but rather legal. The implications of guilt by association are huge in this operation in my opinion and should give everyone pause when considering the increasing power of the government, regionally, local, and federal.
susie
At least you’re talking mothers and children and not families.
Where are the fathers? How are the families defined? How are they indentified? How do they function as a family? How do women relate to the children that aren’t theirs? How do they respond to having their own removed?
And again, where are the fathers and what is their function in all this?
The Vikings used the argument that you were a slave because those charged in your defense were too weak to defend you. So goes my charge-— Where were those charged with protecting these kids? These women? Where were the men of this supposedly super-retro sect, longed for by many for the good old days..... defending the most helpless in this situation?
Maybe the fingers should be pointing at those who made slaves of their own, then left them to be taken.
OH MY GOSH.
“Weapons of mass destruction?”
Get a grip.
The authorities might not of handled this in the *proper* manner but, everyone knew something evil was happening at the ranch and it had to be stopped.
Could you or I do anything? NO! We have government to take care of enforcing the laws, as they are constitutionally bound to do.
The minute people in Texas were aware this Sect had bought property here, (through a 3rd party no less) we knew it was only a matter of time before things would happen. Unlike some of the more *lily livered* states in the Union, Texans don't play that game, Homie.
OOh look! a hoard of pedophile wannabees that want children left with potential rapists in child rape cases while the authorities look into the charges.
Are they just wannabees? They seem awful eager to have those children stay right there.
Fair representation of your post, TNP.