“But my question was, if we don’t accept official birth and marriage records, what would it take to prove your kid was yours.”
Second, you claim no one will answer your question of “what would it take to prove it otherwise”.
Well, what do we have here?
To: CharlesWayneCT
Prove that baby’s mine?
Foot prints, birth records, baby bracelet, medical records, finger prints, blood type, albums full of pictures, pictures on the walls, birth announcements, pictures of me in the delivery room with said baby, video of everything from birth to first poo poo, holiday cards with our pictures, the child calling me ‘Mom’, the other kids calling him/her sister and me Mom, etc...
And if that ain’t enough, DNA. But usually, for CPS, the prior is usually sufficient.
Odd how the FLDS had none of the above.
None.
158 posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:39:06 PM by najida
I never claimed that no-one would answer my question. In fact, a few freepers actually HAD a conversation with me about the question.
I was responding to some who posted replies to my question, but rather than discussing my question, just turned back to the topic of the child abuse, like you did.
I have no interest in discussing whether the seizures were correct, we’ve had that discussion and there’s nothing further to gain. but some want to make EVERY question about it.
My original question was to a person who made a specific statement, and my question was about that statement, and generalized to remove it from the specifics.
You can keep trying to change the topic, and from time to time I fall into the trap, like for example when you say “refused to return ALL the children”, in fact she refused to return ANY of the children.
Including those who allegedly had official paperwork from another state that normally would be considered sufficient to show parentage.
As the judge did not make individual rulings, it’s hard to discuss whether in the specific cases involving records, she still claimed they needed DNA. But she seem to indicate EVERYBODY needed DNA, so that’s a hint.
As to your “END OF STORY”, that is the story. It appears that, rather than ruling individually, she used the “we don’t know the parents” as an excuse, giving her a few weeks breathing room while she waited for the DNA.
The DNA makes sense if you have no evidence of who the kid’s parents are, and a lot of people argued that there were no records, but now we see some allegedly HAVE official records.
But rather than get into endless arguments with people who have no interest in getting to the bottom of anything except “the children were abused”, I am studiously TRYING to avoid discussing that, and instead simply wondered what others would do to prove their parentage.
And some have discussed that with me, and we all had a pleasant time.