Apparently, no matter what specific issue one wants to discuss regarding this case (in this case, what documents should be sufficient to prove a child is yours), the CPS supporters just want to go back to “the children were in danger”, as if that excuses any and all actions.
“Plus they had no way to identify them”. While there were some apparently who weren’t easily identified, there have been multiple stories about specific families where the parents and the children were known to each other. And, oddly enough, this subthread you are commenting on was specifically about families who had LEGAL DOCUMENTS showing their marriage and the birth of their children, and those documents were not accepted by the court.
So apparently, the term “no way to identify them” has some different meaning in these threads, I think it means “they were FLDS, so we have to take away their children”.
They were in the cult. That means they were engaging in the behavior that brought the law down on them. Since many members were not cooperating, it would be difficult to tell who was telling the truth.
“Apparently, no matter what question you are asked, if it doesn’t apply to the one issue you want to talk about, you ignore it.
Why?
I have asked you many questions, and you haven’t answered.
Not that you have too, but you must admit, you are establishing a pattern of avoidance.
I think that many posters, including myself, have tried to answer 90% of your questions, and have addressed the ‘specific issue’ you want to discuss, over, and over, for days.
I already stated that some of the FLDS members told the JUDGE they would be ‘willing’ to provide UTAH Birth Certificates, if the Judge would just return ALL THE CHILDREN, indiscriminately.
The Judge said no. I even offered that I could be wrong, and you could counter it. You either ignored or missed my response.
So, that is proof I did address your questions.
You can stop with the NO ONE WILL ANSWER MY QUESTION stuff.
It is blatantly not true.
“So apparently, the term “no way to identify them” has some different meaning in these threads”
If that is the term that was used by someone, I agree with you, it is not true.
Some of these children may have been positively identified during the execution of the search warrants. Maybe even proof of who their mother is.
That does not, however, prove they were not subject to abuse.