Replies

For the record I have a MS in History, I did get a 96% on the LSAT in 1978, but decided against law school for other more intrinsically valuable pursuits. I have worked with the Pro-life movement for years and a search of my post on the subject might be enlightening, And if the country survives it will not be because of ranting hate mongering idiots like you sir, it will be because of sacrifices of men like my father, uncle, brother-in-law and others who are far better men than you could ever hope to be. Men who have seen war, seen death and often times caused it, but are intelligent enough to know that violence and war should never be the first move, but always the last resort. You can throw out McGovern's name and talk about kumbaya all you want if it makes you feel good, I could care less. Those type of throw away comments are what I have come to expect from people of limited intelligence, it is so much easier to sloganeer than think. I take my guidance from the people in my life that I know and respect who have walked the walk and to a man none of them prays for war or relishes the thought of it like people like you. You are the typical keyboard hawk, always willing to go to war with others people's blood and sacrifice. The fact that you found a law school willing to take you and easy enough for you to graduate from tells me nothing more than there are some law schools out there with pretty low standards if you are representative of their alumni.

I'm done, you win, be happy with yourself, this discussion obviously means a lot more to you than it does to me. Call it cut and run if you want, more easy sloganeering. I learned years ago you can't have an intelligent, insightful conversation with a person who is neither. Go find someone else to harangue with you rants I have more fruitful things to spend my time doing.

Judging by admission standards, my law school was in the top tennationally .

The Kent State trash nonetheless deserved to be taken out. The guard were right and you and yours are wrong.

What does defending leftist student "revolutionaries" have to do with conservatism???

As to "hate mongering," are you advocating speech codes? The whining about "hate speech" is the last resort of desperate liberals including those who pose as "conservative" or "paleo." There are causes and their adherents worth despising, such as the student "revolutionaries" of the 1960s and 1970s. When they hurl chunks of concrete at national guardsmen and are shot, they get what they deserve. If they brainlessly rubberneck nearby and get shot, then they have no one but themselves and the criminal mob to blame.

The LSAT was not scored as 96% or any other percent. It was sckred as were the SATs on a scale of 250 to 800. If you took the LSAT in 1978, that suggests that you were born in about 1957-58 and that you were 13 or so in 1970. If so, the fact that you could do college without deadly combat on campus is something for which you should credit the guard at Kent State.

I'll match my conservative resume (or my IQ) against yours any time and it includes no Kumbaya sniffling over Kent State or any other snuffing of the delusional leftists, arsonists, rioters or their brainless fellow travelers. IQ does not equate to sniveling PC groveling in the dust on behalf of our nation's internal enemies.

Your history on this thread suggests that there is no purpose whatsoever in reviewing your posting history. All you have to do to end this exchange is to stop exchanging.