Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

That sure was an articulate and complete answer to the questions, an answer worthy of the position you take in favor of anti-American punks who got SOME of what they and a lot more deserved. Thanks for playing.


51 posted on 05/05/2008 12:01:40 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

Your questions were a bunch of inarticulate crap.


52 posted on 05/05/2008 12:04:40 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk; TigersEye; Borges
The students of Kent State were ordered that day to disperse from the protest on the Commons and to return to class.

They were not ordered to stay inside, and classes were not canceled.

Schroeder was not on the Commons or near the Commons: he was a Kent State student doing what he was supposed to do, i.e. going to class.

The National Guard units were poorly commanded that day, and the campus radicals were doing their best to prompt a confrontation.

Schroeder did not deserve to die, nor did he take any untoward risks. He was a completely innocent victim of a conflict initiated by leftist radicals and poorly responded to by a miscommanded National Guard unit.

Schroeder's family may have reacted like Cindy Sheehan, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Schroeder did nothing wrong and was actually doing the right thing when he died.

56 posted on 05/05/2008 12:20:27 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson