To: doug from upland
His answer was indeed facetious. How many times under oath has Hillary said that she, “does not recall”? Hundreds?
2 posted on
05/03/2008 9:02:21 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: doug from upland
Doug,
I appreciate what you have done for all these months keeping us informed on this issue. I just sincerely hope all your hard work hits the bullseye and she doesn’t slip away untouched again. We have seen them get away with so much over the years and the frustration level is building. Most of us can’t stand the thought of that lying sack of dung getting away again.
4 posted on
05/03/2008 9:09:30 AM PDT by
dartuser
("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
To: doug from upland
5 posted on
05/03/2008 9:11:29 AM PDT by
tsmith130
To: doug from upland; SE Mom; Miss Didi; holdonnow; Mo1; Bahbah
6 posted on
05/03/2008 9:24:47 AM PDT by
STARWISE
(They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: doug from upland
i was listening to the show, rush was being sarcastic.
keep up the great work.
To: doug from upland
doug,
Didn’t you post this yesterday, and didn’t several people point out that Rush was being sarcastic?
9 posted on
05/03/2008 9:32:21 AM PDT by
NRPM
To: doug from upland
Rush was being sarcastic ... he was parroting a typical Hillary response to the scandal.
10 posted on
05/03/2008 9:33:20 AM PDT by
gitmo
(From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
To: doug from upland
I acknowledged that he was being facetious about Hillary not knowing. The point of this post is that he apparently knows very little about the case. He was not being facetious when he tried to explain the case to her. He wasn’t even close to most of the facts. Shannon, call me and I’ll give you the answer.
11 posted on
05/03/2008 10:03:54 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: doug from upland
Messing with Rush is messing with family. His answer to that call was purely sarcasm. As bad as things can be at times, I shudder to think what and where we would be without him. That being said, keep up the good work!
Remember, with Rush, the ass-kick can be in the sarcasm.
12 posted on
05/03/2008 10:06:05 AM PDT by
Nucluside
(Typical White Person: Curious George)
To: doug from upland
Keep up the GREAT work, DougFromUpland!
21 posted on
05/03/2008 11:15:09 AM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
To: doug from upland
Isn't he being facetious in his answer.
24 posted on
05/03/2008 11:48:17 AM PDT by
carton253
(www.headquartersanv.blogspot.com -- for conversations about the Army of Northern Virginia.)
To: doug from upland
This whole ordeal has to be frustrating to you. It comes down to either Rush knows the details or he doesn’t. If he doesn’t know then he just isn’t the all knowing Maja Rushie. Unlikely.
If he does know, he doesn’t want to put it out there.
Either scenario has some very telling aspects to it. I’ve got my own theory.
30 posted on
05/03/2008 2:24:09 PM PDT by
Current Occupant
(What's the difference between Commie and a Lib??? The Commie know what he's doing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson