[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Just posted this:

Iraq says to document Iran "interference"

with an update from the Washington Post:

**************************EXCERPT************************

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh called reporters late Sunday night to clarify remarks he made at a news conference earlier in the day, when he appeared to say that there was no hard evidence that Iran was allowing weapons to come into Iraq. Dabbagh said his comments had been misinterpreted.

"There is an interference and evidence that they have interfered in Iraqi affairs," Dabbagh said in an interview arranged by a U.S. official. When asked how he would characterize the proof that Iranian weapons are flowing into Iraq, he said: "It is a concrete evidence."

[Marine_Uncle]

Many important points brought out in the multi-interview. No one negated what the others had to say.
So many discussions could be started on so many things that where said. I would just high light the statement being made, where the Iranians would prefer to be bombed if it where to bring down the Mullahs, but not for the sake of disrupting their nuclear program. A majority of them just may not understand what having a breeder reactor of a type that can produce plutonium that can go into making atomic bombs, means in the reality of things. I wonder if most of them realize their leaders could have opted for the Russians to cell them fuel for their reactor(s), and haul off the spent fuel cells that would have contained the plutonium, that would have painted a much different picture. And of course that would then mean they don't need to create the technologies used to gas diffuse by centrifuge enriched uranium U235.
If Iran had played ball, things would have been quite a bit different for them.