ping
Hmmmm, they didn’t account for El Nino? Was this in one of their models? If so: F. If not: F. In my experience with non linear chaotic modeling, one cannot even get the same result twice in a row. That’s because it’s NON LINEAR AND CHAOTIC, D students!! It’s amazing. If an oil company finances studies by folks who could well be hired elsewhere, the results are automatically suspect, no matter which way they lean. However, when “climate scientists” (who have absolutely no other job opportunities save for govt research grants) produce results, these are automatically true - if they indicate human-induced warming. However, see how long they’d have grabts should they “discover” that perhaps humans don’t have much of an effect at all on the climate (and they don’t).