sigh... If you read the trail of posts, you’ll figure out why I invoked the term.
I did read the chain of posts and you correctly invoked the term but incorrectly concluded that the article was 'science'.
The article is scientism under definitions 1 & 2.
You are arguing the article was not scientism under one part of definition #3.
sci·en·tism –noun
1. the style, assumptions, techniques, practices, etc., typifying or regarded as typifying scientists.
2. the belief that the assumptions, methods of research, etc., of the physical and biological sciences are equally appropriate and essential to all other disciplines, including the humanities and the social sciences.
3. scientific or pseudoscientific language.
sigh...