[Jonah Johansen]

Why is virtually everyone on the left and right automatically assuming the audio is authentic much less the sub-titles.
Anyone ever here the term “dub” ?
When you see a still image that is highly derogatory, you immediately think Photoshop.
Why exactly do you think the audio portion of a video is immune to tampering?
In particular use of a person whispering makes it near impossible to tell if it is the real person. How many of you could match someones normal speaking voice with them whispering.
I predict that within the next 8 hours this will shown to be a “Dan Rather type” hoax.

[Abathar]

After watching the second, longer copy of it I definitely now think that the first version has been enhanced. I turn my volume up on the original link I can hear it plain as day, but in the second, longer version I can’t make it out.

I think he should be fired for the first unmistakable remark anyway, whether or not the second comment was altered.