Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oh wellllll.
1 posted on 05/02/2008 6:45:57 AM PDT by Clear Rivers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Clear Rivers
Sooooo, I wonder who IS ensuring the meat packers in SC is getting their monies worth for the campaign contributions they have made?????
2 posted on 05/02/2008 6:48:06 AM PDT by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, criticize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

Gee. And I had high hopes for this guy.


3 posted on 05/02/2008 6:49:08 AM PDT by fweingart (It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

Since when does the Fed tell states how high a fine can be?


4 posted on 05/02/2008 6:49:43 AM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

The bill allows for fines as high as $10,000 when an employer knowingly hires an illegal immigrant.

That’s just so wrong. The employer should be deported since he obviously has no loyalty to the US.


6 posted on 05/02/2008 6:55:13 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

Sanford: Immigration bill not tough enough
http://thestatecom.typepad.com/ygatoday/2008/05/sanford-immigra.html


7 posted on 05/02/2008 7:04:34 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

I guess he’s hoping McPain notices that he’s a team player.


8 posted on 05/02/2008 7:13:02 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We have become an oligarchy not a Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers
Sanford says federal law won't allow the state to impose fines that range that high.

Sanford has vetoed other bills that he believed would not stand up in the courts. He is a real stickler for the law.

9 posted on 05/02/2008 7:14:29 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

Lets see if he is VP materiel.


10 posted on 05/02/2008 7:18:51 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana; AuntB; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Czar; pissant

ping


11 posted on 05/02/2008 7:19:07 AM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

McCain-Goober state, nuff said.


12 posted on 05/02/2008 7:29:58 AM PDT by Biblebelter (Barry, your Uncle Jeremiah is speaking now, Barry can you hear him, Barry what you say now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers
Mark Sanford's one of my favorites, and this is another reason why. If he signs an illegal law, it gets tossed out of court. I know there's been a lot of debate over what Hazelton has done on this issue and they had troubles with the courts.

My gut feeling tells me that the pols in the State Senate want to pass a law they KNOW will be thrown out, have Sanford sign that. The courts then become the bad guys when it is tossed, and then say "We did what we could do, but the courts tossed it out."

21 posted on 05/02/2008 4:46:38 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers

I understand the Senate version will only apply to employers with more than 100 employees. That will be no deterrent to all the landscapers, contractors, etc. that use illegal workers.


24 posted on 05/05/2008 7:44:38 PM PDT by Lynne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clear Rivers
Wow. I used to think the world of Gov Sanford. Maybe the rumors that he wants to be McLame’s VP are true, because he's using McClame-like excuses to avoid solving a pressing problem in SC. Sign the bill already Mark!! Sheesh.
25 posted on 05/10/2008 11:36:26 AM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (Liberalism=stupidity=Obama=false 'hope'=true defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson