Oh wellllll.
To: Clear Rivers
Sooooo, I wonder who IS ensuring the meat packers in SC is getting their monies worth for the campaign contributions they have made?????
2 posted on
05/02/2008 6:48:06 AM PDT by
MCCRon58
(Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, criticize.)
To: Clear Rivers
Gee. And I had high hopes for this guy.
3 posted on
05/02/2008 6:49:08 AM PDT by
fweingart
(It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in!)
To: Clear Rivers
Since when does the Fed tell states how high a fine can be?
4 posted on
05/02/2008 6:49:43 AM PDT by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: Clear Rivers
The bill allows for fines as high as $10,000 when an employer knowingly hires an illegal immigrant.
That’s just so wrong. The employer should be deported since he obviously has no loyalty to the US.
6 posted on
05/02/2008 6:55:13 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
To: Clear Rivers
7 posted on
05/02/2008 7:04:34 AM PDT by
Andy'smom
To: Clear Rivers
I guess he’s hoping McPain notices that he’s a team player.
To: Clear Rivers
Sanford says federal law won't allow the state to impose fines that range that high. Sanford has vetoed other bills that he believed would not stand up in the courts. He is a real stickler for the law.
9 posted on
05/02/2008 7:14:29 AM PDT by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
To: Clear Rivers
Lets see if he is VP materiel.
10 posted on
05/02/2008 7:18:51 AM PDT by
CPT Clay
(Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW ,)
To: Tennessee Nana; AuntB; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Czar; pissant
11 posted on
05/02/2008 7:19:07 AM PDT by
Liz
(Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
To: Clear Rivers
McCain-Goober state, nuff said.
12 posted on
05/02/2008 7:29:58 AM PDT by
Biblebelter
(Barry, your Uncle Jeremiah is speaking now, Barry can you hear him, Barry what you say now.)
To: Clear Rivers
Mark Sanford's one of my favorites, and this is another reason why. If he signs an illegal law, it gets tossed out of court. I know there's been a lot of debate over what Hazelton has done on this issue and they had troubles with the courts.
My gut feeling tells me that the pols in the State Senate want to pass a law they KNOW will be thrown out, have Sanford sign that. The courts then become the bad guys when it is tossed, and then say "We did what we could do, but the courts tossed it out."
21 posted on
05/02/2008 4:46:38 PM PDT by
Darren McCarty
(Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
To: Clear Rivers
I understand the Senate version will only apply to employers with more than 100 employees. That will be no deterrent to all the landscapers, contractors, etc. that use illegal workers.
24 posted on
05/05/2008 7:44:38 PM PDT by
Lynne
To: Clear Rivers
Wow. I used to think the world of Gov Sanford. Maybe the rumors that he wants to be McLame’s VP are true, because he's using McClame-like excuses to avoid solving a pressing problem in SC. Sign the bill already Mark!! Sheesh.
25 posted on
05/10/2008 11:36:26 AM PDT by
LifeOrGoods?
(Liberalism=stupidity=Obama=false 'hope'=true defeat)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson