Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

Isn’t it ironic that a country which espouses freedom of religion required a church to change their marraige practice to become a state in that country?


41 posted on 05/03/2008 5:51:57 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: purpleraine
Isn’t it ironic that a country which espouses freedom of religion required a church to change their marraige practice to become a state in that country?

I didn't realize that the Church became a State.

42 posted on 05/03/2008 5:53:34 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: purpleraine

Deseret had to change its practice.

The Latter-day Saints did not like their territorial status. Church leaders and the territorial legislature contiunously pushed for statehood.

Delegates met in 1856, wrote a Constitution and proposed the state of Deseret. Congress did not agree.

In 1872 a constitutional convention drew up a new Constitution, dropping the Deseret name from their petition. When that failed, the state of Deseret ended.


45 posted on 05/03/2008 6:25:17 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson