To: raybbr
Why am I not surprised that you would prefer that these two men stay in jail? What difference does it make if they are appealing? Bush wants them in jail. If he had any commitment to justice, honor and the sovereignty of the U.S. he would have pardoned them the day they were convicted. Better yet, he would have ordered Sutton to drop the case. But no. You want to protect a drug smuggler before you want to protect two men who were trying to protect you. I am not surprised. Not sure who all that was directed at but I'll respond since you included me.
What difference does it make that they are appealing? None. Bush is determined to appease his buddies across the border and thus, refuses to pardon these two.
Tis but one of the reasons I consider George W. Bush to be the worst president I have ever voted for.
135 posted on
05/02/2008 12:07:12 PM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: South40
Tis but one of the reasons I consider George W. Bush to be the worst president I have ever voted for. Let me see...
- Nixon
- Reagan
- Bush senior
- Bush junior
Yep seems to fit. I suspect a lot of the 71 percent disapproval rate has nothing to do with the war on terrorism.
136 posted on
05/02/2008 12:55:45 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(You should go see "Expelled")
To: South40
It was directed at the "rude one". I included you in the ping because I butted into your conversation. Sorry, I should have been more clear.
Tis but one of the reasons I consider George W. Bush to be the worst president I have ever voted for.
I agree. He has left America more vulnerable to foreign influence than I ever would have imagined possible.
138 posted on
05/02/2008 2:07:36 PM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson