Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom

I’m thinking you misunderstood what I was saying. Did CPS have proof that the monogamous couples were abusing their children? That is not what this was about was it? I’m assuming that it was about men sleeping with underage girls that were supposed to be their wives, not monogamous couples who didn’t practice polygamy.


667 posted on 05/02/2008 5:00:59 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]


To: MissouriConservative

There was at least one underage mother/pregnancy in every dwelling on the compound. I don’t care what they claim. Being “monogamous” doesn’t mean you didn’t give your daughter to an old man to be raped, and doesn’t mean that the “monogamous” wife wasn’t statutorily raped.

The law is if one child is endangered, they all go. I don’t understand why the number is a big deal. Number has no bearing. If it had been 2 children, they would have taken 2.


668 posted on 05/02/2008 5:14:16 PM PDT by Politicalmom (It's the child abuse, stupid!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson