For the sake of discussion, let’s assume 100% of the men women and teenagers are guilty of child abuse. Everyone of them, knew about or participated in pimping out young girls to older men. How does it help the baby to be removed from it’s mother? Where is the imminent harm?
Uh, they DIDN’T separate the girl from her children.
In the grooming of the child to be a sex toy. You just assumed in your question that the teen aged girl participated in abuse and your solution is to give her custody of a tiny human being?
Red Herring. the judge has already ordered that mothers with children could stay with their children. But this new baby was not included in original order. Just a paper work move.
Well, for one thing, this decision comes right on the heels of the media report yesterday about 41 known cases of broken bones among the children...this issue has possibly gone beyond sexual abuse to physical abuse...plus judges don't exactly close their eyes to reports of hundreds of children's graves & unmarked graves at the "sister fLDS communities."
Because these brainwashed victim women will go running off to one of the other compounds as soon as they get the chance and put themselves right back into slavery and willingly raise their daughters to be sex slaves. That’s why.
The mother running with the baby and both disappearing.
Most of the flds women have proven themselves to be untrustworthy with their changing of name bracelets and clothes and swapping babies since they've been off the compound.
IMO, the child was not safe with the mother. LEO must have thought so, too.
I may have missed something. The article said the baby was placed in state custody, not removed from the mother. The mother is also in state custody, so are we sure they are not together? I would hope they would be, myself as well.
susie
The state did not take the baby away from its mom; it placed the baby into state custody. Mom and baby are together, as are all the moms and babies under one year-old.