Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
That was Madison’s view at the time, but unfortunately, I don’t know the context.

Feel free to look them all up.

He is only ONE of the founding fathers anyhow.

But the one single one who was most responsible for creating the Constitution. What you're actually saying is "What the hell did he know?"

But as LG has pointed out, obviously the issue didn’t seem important enough to prohibit, and you know why?

Because neither Madison or any of the other founders thought anyone would be dumb enough to believe unilateral secession was legal?

Because the states would have never ratified the Constitution if secession had been prohibited.

And for the umpteenth time, secession isn't prohibited. Unilateral secession is.

724 posted on 05/31/2008 11:00:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

OK. let me change that to “the states would not have ratified the Constitution if UNILATERAL secession had been prohibited.”

John C. Calhoun, one of the greatest and most brilliant statesman that ever lived believed in unilateral secession.


728 posted on 05/31/2008 12:26:04 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson