Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EPW Comm Team
Peer Reviewed?

All the esteemed scientists voted again. Some of them must having been standing in pretty deep snow to reach this conclusion.

What to do now. Should I cut back on CO2 emission and cause it to get even colder, or should I step up my emissions in order to warm it back up?

2 posted on 04/30/2008 4:40:35 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: w1andsodidwe
Whatever the global warming nuts say, do the opposite.

My summer projects:

build a second wood stove for the kitchen (I have unlimited, free firewood),
Add more insulation all around,
build an ante room to decrease cold ingress through the front door
caulk and seal all windows and other areas.

I'm getting ready for that really hot winter we're going to have.

14 posted on 04/30/2008 4:55:05 PM PDT by Rudder (Klinton-Kool-Aid FReepers prefer spectacle over victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: w1andsodidwe
There are so many academic journals that “peer reviewed” doesn't necessarily mean “quality assured”.

A bunch of like-minded researchers and academics subscribe to, and submit articles to a journal. When an article is submitted, a peer review panel is created by the journal editors. They select this panel from their esteemed readers, and from those who previously submitted articles.

For some of the smaller journals, there's less diversity of ideas than there is genetic diversity in a small polygamous community.

18 posted on 04/30/2008 5:03:16 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson