Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
The operative word here being "physically", correct???

Let me ask you something? Do you own a dog? Did you train it by kicking it? Do you think that kicking, hitting, etc. are ok "training methods"? I'm just trying to figure out where you're coming from on this. On one hand you say being swung around by the neck on a leash "obviously very harmful" but, then you say the dog was found to be "physically unharmed" implying that kicking the dog was not harmful in any way and was, therefore, ok.

103 posted on 04/30/2008 8:25:43 AM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (I'd rather be single than wish I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: My hearts in London - Everett
The operative word here being "physically", correct???

Of course.

Do you own a dog?

Yes I do.

Did you train it by kicking it?

Of course not.

Do you think that kicking, hitting, etc. are ok "training methods"?

Absolutely not. Where have I defended that?

On one hand you say being swung around by the neck on a leash "obviously very harmful" but, then you say the dog was found to be "physically unharmed"...

True and true.

...implying that kicking the dog was not harmful in any way...

Not my intent to imply that at all. That's why I specified "physically."

...and was, therefore, ok.

Your presumption or projection, not my statement.

106 posted on 04/30/2008 8:30:06 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson