[ronnie raygun]

Correct me if Im wrong but wasn’t this program a liberal one? On the other hand Dr. King is defending human rights only because it serves the civil rights struggle. Who will pay for these unwanted babies? Certainly not the single mother and certainly not the load mouths who demand it.
Once again entitlement programs new and greater will be put forward at the taxpayers expence to care for these children until they are 18 years of age. What happened to pro choice? Guess it doesn’t serve a purpose unless thier is an underlying cause that is greater. One more nail in the back of America on it’s way to socialism.

[wagglebee]

Once again entitlement programs new and greater will be put forward at the taxpayers expence to care for these children until they are 18 years of age. What happened to pro choice? Guess it doesn’t serve a purpose unless thier is an underlying cause that is greater. One more nail in the back of America on it’s way to socialism.

I hate to break this to you, but killing people that were deemed "inferior" is a mainstay of socialism.

Freedom CANNOT exist where innocent members of society are systematically targeted for death.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I have never heard Alveda King speak out for "entitlements" that reduce people --- black or white --- to a degrading state of dependency. As far as I know, she is, herself, a conservative Christian and an advocate of responsibility, not multiplying government hand-outs.

What do you mean by "what happened to pro-choice"? In King's case, she had several abortions (so much for "choice") and then experienced a personal converion and came to deeply regret killing her babies. That's why she became a preacher (she is an ordained Protestant minister) and preaches against abortion. God bless her.