Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johniegrad

True. I’m also saying that for long term sustainability, the median price of a house can’t be any greater than 2-3x the median salary/income in any given area. The old 20/80/36 formula worked well for decades - 20% down, borrow 80%, house/insurance/tax costs no more than 36% of income.

There are a lot of areas that have a long way to go down before this is reached.

Selling houses for 500k+ to people making 50k-100k with 0% down and optional principal payments for the first few years was never a good idea.


20 posted on 04/27/2008 4:25:05 PM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: nicola_tesla

“Selling houses for 500k+ to people making 50k-100k with 0% down and optional principal payments for the first few years was never a good idea.”

Agreed, when common sense leaves the building, economic chaos enters.


44 posted on 04/28/2008 6:01:16 AM PDT by mr_hammer (Checking the breeze and barking at things that go bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: nicola_tesla
Correct - except for the 20% down part. Only trade ups have that, from prior home equity from the exact same bubble. First time buyers never have 20% down, and haven't for 20 years. "But back in my day, when houses cost $8000" yeah pops, that ain't now.
82 posted on 04/29/2008 5:27:12 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson