Judge Munoz Saves Hillary’s Presidential Bid In LA Court Action
In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!
In an astonishing ruling by the Judge he ordered that Hillary Clinton would not be compelled to explain in a sworn deposition what her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign was until after teh election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving to the Washington Post in August 2000 and in four false FEC reports made from 2000-2006 (www.paulvclinton.com)
The judge took the opportunity, while making the surprise ruling, to publicly ask Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to “say hello to his ( Judge Munoz”) friend Bill”
This action was taken by the judge on his own, without being asked by Hillary’s lawyer to make the ruling, and with no discussion allowed to Paul’s lawyer. Judge Munoz’ unilateral decision effectively saved the floundering campaign and hopes of Hillary Clinton to win her party’s Presidential nomination! Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for.
Hillary has never publicly commented on the case, the videotaped phone call she made to Peter Paul the day he began spending more than $1 million for her Senate campaign, the false statements she made through Howard Wolfson to the Washington Post denying working with Paul or receiving any contributions from him, the sworn Declaration she made under oath where she refused to deny any of Paul’s allegations, the role her White House aide played in coordinating Paul’s expenditures and many other unanswered question of illegal conduct.
The scandal detailed in Paul’s civil complaint and FEC complaint caused Hillary’s finance director to be criminally indicted and tried in 2005 by the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity (the same group that prosecuted Scooter Libby) for hiding the cost of a fundraiser paid for by Paul. It also caused and Hillary’s campaign to admit to the FEC in October, 2005, that it violated FEC reporting requirements by hiding more than $700,000 received from Paul that Hillary personally said she never received.
Hillary’s sworn deposition will reveal numerous illegalities directed by Hillary with Bill’s help to win and keep her Senate seat and avoid being accountable to the law. The judge’s decision, on his own, to delay that deposition until after the presidential election denies the public’s right to know what a presidential candidate and a former president have done to corrupt- the Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity and its very Chief, Noel Hillman, federal judge A Howard Matz appointed by Bill Clinton who deceived the jury in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director by telling the jury that Hillary was not involved in any way, and the FEC itself who aided and abetted a fourth false FEC report in January, 2006 that omitted any reference to Peter Paul’s 41.2 million contribution for a fourth time!
The Department of Justice prosecutor in the May, 2005 criminal case stated that $1.2 million was personally contributed by Paul at the request of Bill Clinton as part of an employment deal for Clinton’s post White House rainmaking services was confirmed by the FBI and the Dept of Justice Prosecutor Dan Schwaber (pages 55,57,72) during the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May 2005.
Hillary’s treasurer was later forced to admit filing the false FEC reports to hide more than $700,000 paid by Paul, and fined $35,000 (the only fine imposed on Hillary’s campaign) yet Hillary has never answered one question to the media or the courts about these charges!
In fact, Hillary’s sworn Declaration in response to Paul’s sworn allegations constituted a legal admission to Paul’s charges becauseHillary refused to deny any of the allegations!
Strangely, Hillary admitted to the Washington Post in August 2000 knowing that the fundraising event Paul produced and paid for in August, 2000 cost more than $1 million- yet Rosen was indicted on three counts of hiding this fact from Hillary’s campaign causing 3 false FEC reports to be filed!
The cover-up of the original felony violations of the federal election law committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton have resulted in a corruption of every branch of the government by the Clinton’s- all in plain view of the public and with the collusion of the media and the government. Watergate was insignificant as a case of public corruption compared to the mother of all coverups orchestrated here by Hillary Clinton.
