Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antisocial
Now thats what I’m talkin’ ‘bout.

Sounds nice and easy, doesn't it. But, if you did it, like Chuck says he would do, you'd be a dictator and a lawbreaker.

Unilaterally throwing out the UN would breach our nation's treaty obligations, which, under our Constitution, are "the supreme law of the land." You would therefore be a lawbreaker and violator of your sacred oath of office.

You do know this, don't you?

The CP, and Chuck Baldwin, don't. Their actual knowledge of the Constitution is quite shallow, uninformed, and arrogant in its ignorance, at that.

87 posted on 04/27/2008 6:35:08 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("You cannot defend life if you give up the means of that defense." - Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
Unilaterally throwing out the UN would breach our nation's treaty obligationsGet the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!
131 posted on 04/27/2008 9:55:59 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

“Unilaterally throwing out the UN would breach our nation’s treaty obligations, which, under our Constitution, are “the supreme law of the land.” You would therefore be a lawbreaker and violator of your sacred oath of office.”

Bush got by with it by unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty of ‘72.

Are you saying that was a constitutional no no? If so why wasn’t he impeached?


135 posted on 04/28/2008 7:01:15 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson