Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sierra Nevada Rose To Current Height Earlier Than Thought, Say Geologists
Science Daily ^ | 4-26-2008 | Stanford University

Posted on 04/26/2008 3:20:58 PM PDT by blam

Sierra Nevada Rose To Current Height Earlier Than Thought, Say Geologists

Geologists studying deposits of volcanic glass in the western United States have found that the central Sierra Nevada largely attained its present elevation 12 million years ago, roughly 8 or 9 million years earlier than commonly thought. (Credit: iStockphoto/Ken Babione)

ScienceDaily (Apr. 26, 2008) — Geologists studying deposits of volcanic glass in the western United States have found that the central Sierra Nevada largely attained its present elevation 12 million years ago, roughly 8 or 9 million years earlier than commonly thought.

The finding has implications not only for understanding the geologic history of the mountain range but for modeling ancient global climates.

"All the global climate models that are currently being used strongly rely on knowing the topography of the Earth," said Andreas Mulch, who was a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford when he conducted the research. He is the lead author of a paper published recently in the online Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

A variety of studies over the last five years have shown that the presence of the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains in the western United States has direct implications for climate patterns extending into Europe, Mulch said.

"If we did not have these mountains, we would completely change the climate on the North American continent, and even change mean annual temperatures in central Europe," he said. "That's why we need to have some idea of how mountains were distributed over planet Earth in order to run past climate models reliably." Mulch is now a professor of tectonics and climate at the University of Hannover in Germany.

Mulch and his colleagues, including Page Chamberlain, a Stanford professor of environmental earth system science, reached their conclusion about the timing of the uplift of the Sierra Nevada by analyzing hydrogen isotopes in water incorporated into volcanic glass.

They analyzed volcanic glass at sites from the Coast Ranges bordering the Pacific Ocean, across the Central Valley and the Sierra Nevada and into the Basin and Range region of Nevada and Utah.

The ratio of hydrogen isotopes in the glass reflects changes that occurred to the water vapor content of air over the Pacific Ocean as it blew onto the continent and crossed the Sierra Nevada. As the air gains elevation, it cools, moisture concentrates and condenses, and it rains. Water containing heavier isotopes of hydrogen tends to fall first, resulting in a systematic decrease in the ratio of heavy water molecules to lighter ones in the remaining water vapor.

Because so much of the airborne moisture falls as rain on the windward side of the mountains, land on the leeward side gets far less rain—an effect called a "rain shadow"—which often produces a desert.

The higher the mountain, the more pronounced the rain shadow effect is and the greater the decrease in the number of heavy hydrogen isotopes in the water that makes it across the mountains and falls on the leeward side of the range. By determining the ratio of heavier to lighter hydrogen isotopes preserved in volcanic glass and comparing it with today's topography and rainwater, researchers can estimate the elevation of the mountains at the time the ancient water crossed them.

Volcanic glass is an excellent material for preserving ancient rainfall. The glass forms during explosive eruptions, when tiny particles of molten rock are ejected into the air. "These glasses were little melt particles, and they cooled so rapidly when they were blown into the atmosphere that they just froze, basically," Mulch said. "They couldn't crystallize and form minerals."

Because glass has an amorphous structure, as opposed to the ordered crystalline structure of minerals, there are structural vacancies in the glass into which water can diffuse. Once the glass has been deposited on the surface of the Earth, rainwater, runoff and near-surface groundwater are all available to interact with it. Mulch said the diffusion process continues until the glass is effectively saturated with water.

Other researchers have shown that once such volcanic glass is fully hydrated, the water in it does not undergo any significant isotopic exchange with its environment. Thus, the trapped water becomes a reliable record of the isotopic composition of the water in the environment at the time the glass was deposited.

"It takes probably a hundred to a thousand years or so for these glasses to fully hydrate," Mulch said. But 1,000 years is the blink of an eye in geologic time and, for purposes of estimating the timing of events that occur on scales of millions or tens of millions of years, that degree of resolution is quite sufficient.

Likewise, you need deposits of volcanic ash that were laid down relatively quickly over a broad area. But that's the norm for explosive eruptions. Though some ash may circulate in the upper atmosphere for a few years after a major eruption, significant quantities are generally deposited over vast areas within days.

The samples they studied ranged from slightly more than 12 million years old to as young as 600,000 years old, a time span when volcanism was rampant in the western United States owing to the ongoing subduction of the Pacific plate under the continental crust of the North American plate.

"As we use these ashes that are present on either side of the mountain range, we can directly compare what the water looked like before and after it had to cross this barrier to atmospheric flow," Mulch said. "If you just stay behind the mountain range, you see the effect of the rain shadow, but you have to make inferences about where the water vapor is coming from, what happened to the clouds before they traveled across the mountain range.

"For the first time, we were able to document that we can track the [development of the] rain shadow on both sides of the mountain range over very long time scales."

Until now, researchers have been guided largely by "very good geophysical evidence" indicating that the range reached its present elevation approximately 3 or 4 million years ago, owing to major changes in the subsurface structure of the mountains, Mulch said.

"There was a very dense root of the Sierra Nevada, rock material that became so dense that it actually detached and sank down into the Earth's mantle, just because of density differences," Mulch said. "If you remove a very heavy weight at the base of something, the surface will rebound."

The rebound of the range after losing such a massive amount of material should have been substantial. But, Mulch said, "We do not observe any change in the surface elevation of the Sierra Nevada at that time, and that's what we were trying to test in this model."

However, Mulch said he does not think his results refute the geophysical evidence. It could be that the Sierra Nevada did not evolve uniformly along its 400-mile length, he said. The geophysical data indicating the loss of the crustal root is from the southern Sierra Nevada; Mulch's study focused more on the northern and central part of the range. In the southern Sierra Nevada, the weather patterns are different, and the rain shadow effect that Mulch's approach hinges on is less pronounced.

"That's why it's important to have information that's coming from deeper parts of the Earth's crust and from the surface and try to correlate these two," Mulch said. To really understand periods in the Earth's past where climate conditions were markedly different from today, he said, "you need to have integrated studies."

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Adapted from materials provided by Stanford University.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geologists; nevada; sierra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2008 3:20:59 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Its all about climate now, climate, climate, climate. I guess to get ANY money for research now you have to relate it to climate. Al Gore is detroying science.


2 posted on 04/26/2008 3:43:45 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Asked on his deathbed why he was reading the bible, WC Fields replied "I'm looking for loopholes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Bump to a most interesting article. I remember talking to geologists in Baker, CA (which is just south of Death Valley and west of Palm Springs), and Las Vegas, Nevada. They described the geologic landscape in between as so complicated it looked like someone had dropped the whole thing out of an giant airplane. Rock layers hundreds of millions years apart in age stacked on top of each other.


3 posted on 04/26/2008 3:44:30 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Geologic timeline of Western North America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A timeline of significant geological events in the evolution of western North America. Dates are approximate.

350 million years B.P. (Devonian) - An unnamed terrane collides and accretes to the North American Plate, along a line roughly coinciding with the Nevada-Utah border and called the Carlin Unconformity.

250 million years B.P. (Permian) - The Sonomia Terrane collides and accretes to the North American Plate, along a line called the Golconda Thrust (also the name of the event) which runs through central Nevada.

200 million years B.P. (Triassic) - Sierra Nevada batholith first develops.

165 million years B.P. (Jurassic) - The Smartville Block, an island arc terrane collides and accretes to the North American Plate, along a line which coincides with the Mother Lode country of California.

140 million years B.P. (Jurassic) - Second wave of plutons added to Sierra batholith.

90 million years B.P. (Cretaceous) - Third and last wave of plutons added to Sierra batholith.

43 million years B.P. (Eocene) - The Pacific Plate changes its direction of motion from north to northwest.

35 million years B.P. (Eocene) - Rio Grande Rift begins to form.

20 million years B.P. (Miocene) - San Andreas Fault comes into being as the North American Plate begins splitting the Farallon Plate in two.

8 million years B.P. (Miocene) - Onset of faulting creating the Basin and Range geologic province.

5 million years B.P. (Miocene-Pliocene)- Northward propagation of the East Pacific Rise into the North American Plate initiates rifting off of the Baja California peninsula.

4 million years B.P. (Pliocene) - Sierra Nevada begins to rise.

3.5 million years before present (Pliocene) - The Pacific Plate changes its direction of motion about 11 degrees east of its previous heading, from northwest to the present north by northwest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_timeline_of_Western_North_America

4 posted on 04/26/2008 3:45:52 PM PDT by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
"Its all about climate now, climate, climate, climate..."

I fear you're creating a hostile climate.

5 posted on 04/26/2008 3:53:02 PM PDT by billorites (Freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xJones
They described the geologic landscape in between as so complicated it looked like someone had dropped the whole thing out of an giant airplane. Rock layers hundreds of millions years apart in age stacked on top of each other.

Read "Assembling California" by John McPhee. Most of CA west of the Sierra consists of island chain terranes that have slammed into the continent from all over the planet. It's some really crazy mixed-up geology.

6 posted on 04/26/2008 4:09:34 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eye On The Left
350 million years B.P.

BP? You mean BC.

7 posted on 04/26/2008 4:13:09 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Geology is barely a science. Mostly opinions, like psychology.


8 posted on 04/26/2008 4:14:09 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

That would be 350 million minus 2000 or 349,997,000 BC


9 posted on 04/26/2008 4:16:37 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Impossible! The world is only 6,000 years old. Those that say otherwise are idolators and a threat to our way of life.


10 posted on 04/26/2008 4:20:03 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
350 million years B.P. BP? You mean BC.

BP = Before Present

Besides, I didn't write that piece. It came from wikipedia.

11 posted on 04/26/2008 4:34:54 PM PDT by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Geology is barely a science. Mostly opinions, like psychology.

Have you ever taken a Geology class for credit or read, from start to finish, an actual peer-reviewed academic paper on geology?

12 posted on 04/26/2008 5:13:42 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

You a geologist? If it has math it is natural science. Otherwise it is opinion.


13 posted on 04/26/2008 5:17:09 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

A geologist is like a detective.


14 posted on 04/26/2008 5:33:18 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Geology is barely a science. Mostly opinions, like psychology.

Psychology is a religion, although geology isn't far behind.

15 posted on 04/26/2008 5:34:09 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Read "Assembling California" by John McPhee.

Thanks for the reference, I'll look it up.

16 posted on 04/26/2008 5:46:56 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You a geologist? If it has math it is natural science. Otherwise it is opinion.

I'm not a geologist. You didn't answer my question, btw; how can you make a judgement about an entire field of study without having taken even a basic class or read a scientific paper about the discipline?

Geology is chock-full of math; huge amounts of thermodynamics to understand rock formation, for example. Seismology involves vast amounts of data and statistical analysis. Understanding tectonics involves GPS data analysis, complex computer modeling, etc.

And of course it involves massive amounts of grueling fieldwork; weeks and months living in the field, walking thousands of miles, examining and sampling outcrop after outcrop, learning to visualize what's below the surface from what you can see at the surface.

Pick up an ACTUAL journal of geology, and you'll find many articles chock-full of mathematical equations (I don't mean press releases, Science Daily, etc.)

Your geological contributions seem to be, if I recall correctly, popping up every time there's a quake near a full moon to assert it caused the quake (and being completely quiet about the many quakes not near a full moon.) I guess that's your impression of what geology is.

17 posted on 04/26/2008 6:12:34 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Geology is barely a science. Mostly opinions, like psychology.

Good gawd. I used to like to read your comments, but not so much anymore since they seem insane.

Take a vacation.

18 posted on 04/26/2008 6:19:26 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam; cmsgop
Sierra Nevada? I'm enjoying one right now!
19 posted on 04/26/2008 6:19:38 PM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Me too! And I live in the Sierra!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

20 posted on 04/26/2008 6:51:00 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson