Congressional calculus triggered Syria disclosures ( North Korea giving Syria Nuclear Secrets)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - If President George W. Bush wants to make progress on ending North Korea's nuclear ambitions before he leaves office next year, he first has to close the deal with Congress.

The White House took a step to try to win congressional support on Thursday by laying out intelligence alleging that North Korea helped Syria to build a nuclear reactor that U.S. officials say was destroyed by Israel on September 6.

The White House initially tried to keep the matter secret, fearing Damascus might be embarrassed by a public airing of the strike -- and the fact that Israeli jets apparently came and went unscathed -- and would be tempted to retaliate.

So it briefed only 22 U.S. lawmakers about the matter last year and it refused to comment even after The New York Times reported in mid-October that the Israeli strike had targeted a nuclear reactor.

Over time, the White House judged that the risk of Syrian retaliation against Israel, which is widely believed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, had receded.

Also, the administration has come under growing pressure from Congress to more widely share the information so that lawmakers will back, or at least not block, its efforts to end North Korea's nuclear programs.

Under an agreement reached in September 2005, the poor, communist state committed to abandon all nuclear weapons and programs in return for economic and diplomatic benefits.

The so-called six-party agreement was hammered out among the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States.

The agreement has been bogged down by North Korea's failure to produce a declaration of its nuclear programs that was due at the end of last year.

In return, Washington is to drop two sets of U.S. sanctions stemming from Pyongyang's presence on the U.S. state sponsors of terrorism list and the U.S. Trading With the Enemy Act.

"Congress has been asking for the specifics on Syria before they would agree to any sanctions lifting," said Mike Green, a former Bush administration Asia specialist now at the CSIS think tank. "The administration had no choice but to brief."

The U.S. Congress holds sway over whether to provide money to the administration to dismantle North Korean nuclear sites and it could also block removing the country from the U.S. terrorism list.

Heritage Foundation Korea expert Bruce Klingner said the intelligence briefings partly reflected the administration's realization that they were otherwise "unlikely to get funding" to dismantle North Korea's nuclear facility at Yongbyon.

Several people familiar with the matter say Washington has devised a face-saving formula for North Korea under which it would produce a declaration of its plutonium program, but would simply "acknowledge" U.S. concerns about its suspected uranium enrichment and proliferation activities, including in Syria.

The formula, first disclosed two weeks ago, appears to have brought Washington closer to securing the declaration but it has been criticized by a number of Bush's fellow Republicans.

Several analysts and congressional aides rejected media reports that this week's briefings were prompted by U.S. officials who oppose the talks with North Korea and hope to scuttle them.

"The crunch point here was linked to progress in the six-party talks, rather than an effort to undermine the six-party talks," said a congressional aide who asked not to be named.

Another congressional aide who also asked not to be named said the detailed nature of the intelligence on Syria -- including what U.S. officials said were photographs taken inside the suspected reactor -- had increased pressure on the White House to ensure that any North Korea deal could be verified.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Chris Hill, the top U.S. negotiator with North Korea, said the United States and North Korea had "productive" talks in Pyongyang this week on the declaration and how to verify it.

"What's important in the six parties we need to be able to ensure that every undertaking, every commitment can be monitored and verified," Hill told reporters after giving a speech at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.

"You cannot take a commitment that does not have some mechanism for verification attached," he added.

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003771.html

U.S. aerospace industry and retired military officials indicated the Israelis utilized a technology like the U.S.-developed “Suter” airborne network attack system developed by BAE Systems and integrated into U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle operations by L-3 Communications. Israel has long been adept at using unmanned systems to provoke and spoof Syrian surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems, as far back as the Bekka Valley engagements in 1982.

Air Force officials will often talk about jamming, but the term now involves increasingly sophisticated techniques such as network attack and information warfare. How many of their new electronic attack options were mixed and matched to pull off this raid is not known.

More interesting is the newspaper’s claim that “Russian experts are studying why the two state-of-the-art Russian-built radar systems in Syria did not detect the Israeli jets entering Syrian territory,” it said. “Iran reportedly has asked the same question, since it is buying the same systems and might have paid for the Syrian acquisitions.”

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.