Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
You see there is the real problem. Political leadership completely detached from military realities.

It is the duty of US Navy officers charged with the responsibility for command, of ships and fleets, to ensure that their superiors are kept informed as to readiness status. It would be valuable to know if senior Admirals have voiced concerns such as those you have mentioned. As I stated previously, results of the surface fleet review will be very important.

If Navy leaders have failed to properly assess and/or report the state of readiness, they must share in the blame. Politicians are notorious for giving the majority of the electorate what is desired, whether justified or not. And I don't hear the electorate clamoring for more naval assets, at present. This is will be a very interesting time for the Navy.


41 posted on 04/26/2008 8:35:51 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: PerConPat

Correction:

“this is will be” = “this will be”


42 posted on 04/26/2008 8:51:11 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson